NewPharoah_Max
01/02/07 02:26 PM
207.160.205.13
|
Q1, Cray, the rule ideas I've typed: do I send them to you, Cray, or to Randall Bills or who do I send them to? Q2, What does everyone think about bringing back the rules for LAMs? Ever since Covert Ops was published I think the LAMs (not the pictures but the units & rules for them) should be brought back. The way I see it LAMs are what CIA (Covert Intelligent Agents) personnel would use.
My LAM rules: http://www.sarna.net/forums/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/138580/an/0/page/0#138580
The Balancer LAM I designed and built in thought: http://www.sarna.net/forums/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/142766/an/0/page/0#142766
Greetings to you too.
Edited by NewPharoah_Max (01/02/07 02:30 PM)
|
Greyslayer
01/03/07 10:50 AM
216.14.198.52
|
sear them from the records.... little kiddie toys in a big kiddie game.
|
Toontje
01/03/07 07:36 PM
131.155.212.78
|
Well.. LAM's would not be covert, but more specops. Covert, at most a stealth BA suit, not a mech in any incarnation.
Personally would only use them as vanguard for a planetary assault, or as light objective raid units.
Rather to blow up, then.
|
NewPharoah_Max
01/03/07 08:12 PM
207.160.205.13
|
Yes LAMs would at least be special ops. In real life a CIA guy in a VTOL shot down a wingstube.
Greetings to you too.
|