s for Cray and the rest of you

Pages: 1
NewPharoah_Max
01/02/07 02:26 PM
207.160.205.13

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
Q1, Cray, the rule ideas I've typed: do I send them to you, Cray, or to Randall Bills or who do I send them to?
Q2, What does everyone think about bringing back the rules for LAMs? Ever since
Covert Ops was published I think the LAMs (not the pictures but the units & rules for them) should be brought back. The way I see it LAMs are what CIA (Covert Intelligent Agents) personnel would use.

My LAM rules:
http://www.sarna.net/forums/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/138580/an/0/page/0#138580

The Balancer LAM I designed and built in thought:
http://www.sarna.net/forums/showflat.php/Cat/0/Number/142766/an/0/page/0#142766
Greetings to you too.


Edited by NewPharoah_Max (01/02/07 02:30 PM)
Greyslayer
01/03/07 10:50 AM
216.14.198.52

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
sear them from the records.... little kiddie toys in a big kiddie game.
Toontje
01/03/07 07:36 PM
131.155.212.78

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
Well.. LAM's would not be covert, but more specops. Covert, at most a stealth BA suit, not a mech in any incarnation.

Personally would only use them as vanguard for a planetary assault, or as light objective raid units.
Rather to blow up, then.
NewPharoah_Max
01/03/07 08:12 PM
207.160.205.13

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
Yes LAMs would at least be special ops. In real life a CIA guy in a VTOL shot down a wingstube.
Greetings to you too.
Pages: 1
Extra information
1 registered and 105 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Nic Jansma, Cray, Frabby, BobTheZombie 

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is enabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Topic views: 4936


Contact Admins Sarna.net