Quote:
But again, the issue remains, that the SLMAS is still head and shoulders above contemporaries. 'Just two' per mech is still enough to make the light mech king, a fast mover that can concentrate a hilarious amount of damage in one location, and is fast enough to get behind you? Well dead is dead, and its still packing the punch to do that to some other poor sod. (Poor sod being fellow Assault Mech)
You mention the RL-20 as a contender for mass and such being 1.5 tons loaded. But there are several key differences between the mid ranged slammer (as closest stat for stat it bears the closest look).

First, no cluster. That thing hits, it slams all 24 damage in one location which will more or less breach the side torsos of any mech under 65 tons, go much less than that and you can get severe internal structure damage thrown on too (likely popping the ST of any mech that masses 40 tons or less) the RL 20 on the other hand, hits in 5 point clusters, which means even with the big (still smaller) damage potential it more likely hits in with 12ish points of damage scattered across 3 sections.

Second is heat efficiency. The inbuilt streak tech in slammers makes them head and shoulders better than their RL 20 counterpart, when you pop off an RL, not only does its unguided **** get a penalty to hit, but it still fires on the miss, perma wasted, still genning the 5 heat, but no 'splodin enemy payoff. The slammer on the otherhand, no hit, no launch, no heat, no problem. It still nastily spikes when it hits, but then you've hit, and the problem is less shaking, as the enemy took a helluva punch for relative little heat.

Third, is crit intake, and this links nicely in with heat efficiency, the SLMAS is only 1 crit to the RL 20's 3, not that in itself is notable, for the same mass, you get 2 free crits, 4 in a 2 for 2 exchange. That leaves more crit space for other things, like dhs, more weapons, or other weight saving measures. (Hell, I'd be tempted to fit it with SRMs or RL10's and try to critseek the nice big holes knocked in the target).

On top of all this is range, yes the mid ranged SLMAS has a minimum range while the RL 20 doesn't, but it has a longer base range, and thus better range brackets combined with accuracy and heat efficiency will end with you more willing to attempt to fire them, while with the RL 20s you conserve till you get the best shot possible (or firecracker off expecting to hit nothing but scare the bejeebus out of someone).

Now for reloads, I guess the expanded time is an issue to an extent, but unless you are in full invadificated scenario you will get the time to reload between engagements, if only during maintenance before battle.

On top of that my earlier point still stands, just slightly differently, gone is the SLMAS swarm heavy vehicles and vtols, and hello to the 10 ton engines with tiny crew spaces and launch rails. If you can only mount 2 go mad, unleash 10 ton hovercraft with crazy speeds and 2 launchers, nothing to stop you, do the same with vtols. If you can deliver a knock out punch for a mech for (equivalent to their cost) pennies, why on earth would you not capitalize? Its the Savannah Master swarm, but even more utterly devastating as a lance or two of them pop to the rear of your Assault mech lance and reduce their RT's to something resembling clam chowder. (And presumably die to supporting troops or more likely zip off to base to reload and later rejoin the fight).

Quote:
With this system, defensive units are not necessary, since you could mount tens, maybe hundreds of the systems on a single building. Every 2 systems can have its own targetting computer in a building.
Now lets get into some variants.
Use them as command detonated mines. How many munitions could you place in a field?
Have remote targetting and launching of the system, making an entire valley including the hillsides as a way to destroy not only mechs, but dropships in range.
There are other potential abuses of the system, but with these 2, why worry about other weapons. As part of a defensive building, you could reload them as you use them. Mount 2 systems on a Savanha Master, and hit-run-reload all day long. At this point, why even bother with mechs? Guess bombarding the planet from orbit would be the only way to defeat it.

I have the books from 3055. After that, alot of hobby shops in arizona didnt carry battle tech much.

Now before you start complaining about people commenting on your system, reread it yourself. You did not explain alot of things properly, such as 1 infantry can carry the command or slammer. There you said the 7 had 2 command units. At one per infantry, that means the other 5 can carry a slammer each. With 2 command units, which sounds like a launcher, you could fire 2 missles. With a possible 5 missles, or so the slammer sounds like, thats 2 per round for 2 rounds with a single one left over. 1 per infantry is possible, but that would be more of a static position since 1 person would be carrying a 40kg missile...realistically, it would be 1 shot per 3 infantrymen...I don't know if you are tracking support weapon rules, but this is a modification that makes an infantry squad more like a battle armor squad for weapon/ammo tracking--see page 152 of TechManual, infantry unit construction: support weapons in an infantry squad. Since I don't want the squad running around for 30 turns firing a total of 30 SLMAS, I want it set up more like a Battle Armor weapon system rather than an infantry support weapon. A squad can carry 2 support heavy lasers for 3 damage each round for 15 hexes. With the SLMAS, the squad can do a total max damage of 12 pts (probably 6 damage) out to 20 hexes, but they can't do it for 30 rounds, that 12 or 6 pts is expended all at once. Then they go to their primary, anti-personnel weapons. The SLMAS stats for TechManual would be along these lines:
Type: SLMAS
TechBase: IS
Class/Type (Damage Type): Medium/Support (Ballistic)
Base Range: 6
Damage (each): 3
Weight of Weapon/Ammo (Shots): 10.0 kg/30.0 kg (1)
Crew: 3
This switches a platoon to having an option of doing 40 or so pts of damage in 1 shot if I were conducting it like normal infantry, then doing 2 or 3 points out to 6 hexes for the rest of the fight.
Right now, standard rules allow infantry to repeatedly use their support weapons without tracking ammo

Now, you complain about me being behind the times and stupid, but even I can see this system is not anywhere close to playable in a normal game. Now if you think this system will be fun for the game, then you have played it and arent that good, or you dont like actually having to use tactics to play a good game.

Make an assault mech cry with a locust? Since you think Karagins assessment of your system is on the spot, you put this in to cause an uproar, since this is so out of balance to the game. I really thought rockets and rotary cannons and now the heap ac rounds, gyroscopic ac rounds and such are just too much garbage for the game. Cannon rules like natural apptitude that allows 3d6 for gunnery is bs. Using supplements, the Kell Hounds have the stealth skill that unbalances the game as well.The newer stuff is part of why I stopped dealing with battletech, since it started becoming nothing more then higher damage, stand and deliver play instead of having to survive by using your brain. Getting a player group together now is much more difficult than it was in 1995 and most players who are willing to play want to play with the new systems...I understand because the old system is a lot slower, but the new system has allowed players to build Assault mechs that have high mobility, max armor, and top-notch weaponry...and these aren't just home-grown house mechs, these are coming straight out of the the TROs. So, I agree with you in your assessment of the new stuff, but I need something that can level the playing field while enabling me to use the combined arms forces that should represent militia/garrison/pirate troops without allowing 4 players running less than a company of mechs to run over what amounts to 1/2 of a regimental combat team. I have tried to use the logistics rules (and introduced some of my own) as well as things from Strategic Ops, but the system still allows 80-100 ton 3065 mechs to kill 1 or 2 companies of normally weighted 3050 mechs by simply coming straight at them. If you are playing campaign style that leaves a couple of unsatisfactory options: Giving ALL forces 3065 mechs, creating regimental-sized militia forces to defend a small, strategically insignificant objective, or giving militia troops 2/3 or better gunnery and piloting skills.

Now you dont like the long range weapon use and want to allow light units to engage in combat. How about using real terrain in battles, such as limited open areas so they cannt sit at 20 hexes and fire away? Try city battles, with very few long roads? Are your players part of a house or merc unit? Supplies arent always availible. Maybe even have the enemy use the same weapons against them with more availible to the enemy. Play an actual campaign with limited supplies. Oh my. You depleted the lrms in the first battle and cannt get anymore for a few weeks. Gee, the enemy is closing in on you for a raid now.

Quote:
Cannon rules like natural apptitude that allows 3d6 for gunnery is bs.

Quote:
The newer stuff is part of why I stopped dealing with battletech, since it started becoming nothing more then higher damage, stand and deliver play

Quote:
Really? Binary Laser and some of the other stuff that has come along kind reaches into the land of munchy