Karagin
01/30/14 09:20 PM
24.243.178.124
|
Code: BattleTech Vehicle Technical Readout
VALIDATED
Type/Model: Kershaw (SPAW)
Tech: Inner Sphere / 3085
Config: Tracked Vehicle
Rules: Level 2, Standard design
Mass: 96 tons
Power Plant: 290 Omni Fusion
Cruise Speed: 32.4 km/h
Maximum Speed: 54.0 km/h
Armor Type: Acbar 55 Standard
Armament:
1 Freedom Arms Long Tom Artillery
1 Diverse Optics ER Small Laser
Manufacturer: Tholin Industries
Location: Tholin
Communications System: SemTex 2000
Targeting & Tracking System: Pauley-Bronson Z
--------------------------------------------------------
Type/Model: Kershaw (SPAW)
Mass: 96 tons
Equipment: Items Mass
Int. Struct.: 50 pts Standard 0 10.00
Engine: 290 Fusion 0 17.50
Shielding & Transmission Equipment: 0 9.00
Cruise MP: 3
Flank MP: 5
Heat Sinks: 10 Single 0 .00
Cockpit & Controls: 0 5.00
Crew: 7 Members 0 .00
Turret Equipment: 0 3.00
Armor Factor: 256 pts Standard 0 16.00
Internal Armor
Structure Value
Front: 10 60
Left / Right Sides: 10 57/57
Rear: 10 22
Turret: 10 60
Weapons and Equipment Loc Heat Ammo Items Mass
--------------------------------------------------------
1 Long Tom Artillery Turret 0 25 2 35.00
1 ER Small Laser Front 2 1 .50
--------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS: 2 3 96.00
Items & Tons Left: 21 .00
Calculated Factors:
Total Cost: 5,268,970 C-Bills
Battle Value 2: 1,435 (old BV = 885)
Cost per BV: 3,671.76
Weapon Value: 645 / 645 (Ratio = .45 / .45)
Damage Factors: SRDmg = 16; MRDmg = 15; LRDmg = 15
BattleForce2: MP: 3T, Armor/Structure: 0 / 10
Damage PB/M/L: 2/2/3, Overheat: 0
Class: GA; Point Value: 14
Specials: artL
Karagin
Given time and plenty of paper, a philosopher can prove anything.
|
His_Most_Royal_Highass_Donkey
01/31/14 12:18 AM
172.56.38.87
|
I would ditch a lot of that armor because Artillery pieces should not come under a great amount of fire. And if they do they are toast anyways. If you add another 10 tons of ammo it will be able to stay in the fight three times as long.
Why argue if the glass is half full or half empty, when you know someone is going to knock it over and spill it anyways.
I was a Major *pain* before
But I got a promotion.
I am now a General *pain*
Yay for promotions!!!
|
Karagin
01/31/14 06:27 AM
24.243.178.124
|
The base chassis is the same as the first Kershaw I posted, the idea being use the same hull with minor changes and go forward from there. Also there would be an ammo carrier supplying this vehicle and its' lancemates with ammo once the on board bins are empty.
Karagin
Given time and plenty of paper, a philosopher can prove anything.
|
Retry
01/31/14 01:35 PM
72.214.204.166
|
But it is not a conventional artillery piece. It is a self propelled gun. It is a bigger and easier to spot target and in this case slow.
And as Karagin says it is basically a field mod of sorts. Taking time to strip out armor from the vehicle makes no sense from a technical standpoint.
|
ghostrider
01/31/14 04:01 PM
66.27.181.51
|
could be the begining of omni vehicles for the innersphere. It is definately long overdue.
But using the same chasis for several different configurations could be good. Lowers cost by not having to build a new body for every varient.
Though the armor/ammo comment makes sense.
Maybe use the same chasis and build the support units for this one.
|