Retry
04/30/14 08:34 PM
76.7.236.208
|
King Tiger Pursuit Hovertank
IS TW non-box set
50 tons
BV: 1,265
Cost: 9,077,667 C-bills
Movement: 10/15 (Hover)
Engine: 265 XL
Internal: 25
Armor: 118 (Light Ferro-Fibrous)
Internal Armor
Front 5 35
Right 5 26
Left 5 26
Rear 5 11
Turret 5 20
Weapons Loc Heat
Light PPC TU 5
Light PPC TU 5
MML 3 TU 2
MML 3 TU 2
MML 3 TU 2
MML 3 TU 2
MagShot FR 1
MagShot FR 1
Ammo Loc Shots
MML 3 LRM Ammo BD 40
MML 3 SRM Ammo BD 33
Magshot GR Ammo BD 50
Equipment Loc
CASE BD
Targeting Computer BD
|
ghostrider
04/30/14 08:40 PM
24.30.142.80
|
this is where the program doesn't show what it needs to. I see a targetting computer, but not how many tons it is.
is it supposed to run the whole tank or just the drivers joystick?
it is for the commanders game or facebook account?
|
Retry
04/30/14 08:48 PM
76.7.236.208
|
It's an item you use to increase the effectiveness of DF weapons. It's on the sarna wiki somewhere.
|
Karagin
04/30/14 10:52 PM
70.118.139.48
|
And it cost weight and crits even in vehicles Retry. Really you need to use a design program that works and is not half baked as the Mega Mek one is.
Karagin
Given time and plenty of paper, a philosopher can prove anything.
|
Retry
04/30/14 11:22 PM
76.7.236.208
|
It's shown in the program and not in the outline. If it was shown in the outline I'd edit it out.
|
Karagin
05/01/14 06:11 AM
70.118.139.48
|
So you removed the weight and crits of the TC, why?
Karagin
Given time and plenty of paper, a philosopher can prove anything.
|
ghostrider
05/01/14 08:22 AM
24.30.142.80
|
so someone would have to actually plug everything into a program or sit down and go through it to see if everything was correct.
We know megamek is not completely reliable, since the one vehicle was proven wrong.
He does not want to show this is another production vehicle that uses mixed tech. Instead of being the innersphere weight for the tc, he probabaly used clan weight again.
|
Retry
05/01/14 09:47 AM
72.214.204.166
|
And "the one vehicle" was...?
Last I recall every vee that was modified and claimed to be overweight ended up with all guns in the turret or something causing the mysterious missing half tons themselves.
Tiger shark already explained the thing with the armored chassis.
|
Karagin
05/01/14 11:05 AM
70.118.139.48
|
That or he doesnt understand the rules about the tonnage the IS version pays.
Karagin
Given time and plenty of paper, a philosopher can prove anything.
|
Retry
05/01/14 11:42 AM
72.214.204.166
|
Since you know everything that is about IS crits and tonnages, feel free to prove this invalid by plugging the numbers in.
|
Karagin
05/01/14 06:17 PM
70.118.139.48
|
Retry, the point is you are posting things that are incorrect in that all you are giving us is it has XYZ, plugging in the numbers isn't the point, the point is your design program has proven to be wrong and you have admitted to editing things out
Quote:
Retry wrote:
It's shown in the program and not in the outline. If it was shown in the outline I'd edit it out.
So how about you provide the tonnage of each item and the crits, which 99% of the rest of the folks posting actually do provide and give us things like is the engine fusion or ICE, is it a tracked or wheeled or what not vehicle, things that are a bit important.
And given that you have medium ranged weapons for the most part, I am not sure what you are even trying to do with the this hovertank given how fragile hover tanks are in Battletech.
Karagin
Given time and plenty of paper, a philosopher can prove anything.
|
Retry
05/01/14 07:30 PM
76.7.236.208
|
It is of my opinion that showing such equipment is not necessary as anyone who owns TechManual or whatever would be able to check for themselves if the "givens" add up. Anything not a given is shown.
|
ghostrider
05/01/14 10:40 PM
24.30.142.80
|
I was referring to the combat armored chasis that did not have a bar. You seemed to have stopped posting for a while after someone had asked about it in another thread.
Only support vehicles were supposed to be able to use that or something like it.
I guess I will have to bump the thread.
|
Retry
05/01/14 10:48 PM
76.7.236.208
|
The reverse is true. You guys stopped posting after Tigershark popped up with a reason for/against it.
|
ghostrider
05/02/14 01:33 AM
24.30.142.80
|
I was waiting for your responce telling us where it said any different from they he said. And that was after he posted it, so stop posting isn't quite true.
But this is way off track now.
|