tmr01750195
11/03/18 04:51 PM
76.121.197.44
|
Hello all,
I took a look at ProtoMech Construction in FanPro BMR Revised, CGL TM PDF downloaded July 2018, and the results from FanPro BMR Revised and HMLite using the Delphyne-2 ProtoMech example from the CGL TM PDF are different.
A couple of questions:
1. Is the FanPro BMR Revised and HMLite BV calculation process considered BV1?
2. Which method of BV calculation is the correct one to use when determining BV?
|
Karagin
11/03/18 08:58 PM
72.176.187.91
|
CGL stuff normally supersedes FANPRO stuff, the current rule set is the one CGL has put out with the Core Rule Books.
Karagin
Given time and plenty of paper, a philosopher can prove anything.
|
tmr01750195
11/04/18 12:30 AM
76.121.197.44
|
Evening from WA Karagin,
Thank you for the reply and clarifying that CGL is the latest rule set being used.
HMLite is using FanPro BV calculations which did help me figure out why my FanPro BMR BV calculation did not match because I overlooked the alterations to the vehicle BV calculations.
Tom Rux
|
Karagin
11/04/18 01:48 AM
72.176.187.91
|
Rick's stuff isn't that far off, if you are using the updated equipment file that you can find on his main page and follow the directions he has given then you will get a better take on the BV.
Karagin
Given time and plenty of paper, a philosopher can prove anything.
|
tmr01750195
11/04/18 01:12 AM
76.121.197.44
|
Evening again from WA Karagin,
I did use the updated equipment file and I've played with the various material on the sites pages.
Using CGL TM the ProtoMech's BV is 317 and HMLite/FanPro Classic BMR the value is 237.
Thank you again for the response
Tom Rux
|