Godhammer: 75-ton "Warhammer 2.0"

Pages: 1
CarcerKango
12/18/18 12:59 PM
73.238.89.48

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply

Godhammer GHM-3R
3067 IS Heavy

Source: My Own Custom /
Type/Model: Godhammer GHM-3R
Tech: Inner Sphere / 3067
Config: Biped BattleMech
Rules: Level 2, Standard design

Mass: 75 tons
Chassis:
Power Plant: 300 Fusion
Walking Speed: 43.2 km/h
Running Speed: 64.8 km/h
Armor Type: Light Ferro-Fibrous
Armament:
1 Streak SRM 6
1 Heavy PPC
1 Heavy PPC
Manufacturer:
Location:
Communications System:
Targeting and Tracking System:


---------------------------------------------------------
Type/Model: Godhammer GHM-3R
Mass: 75 tons

Equipment: Crits Mass
Int. Struct.: 114 pts Endo Steel 14 4.00
(Endo Steel Loc: 1 HD, 7 LT, 5 RA, 1 LA)
Engine: 300 Fusion 6 19.00
Walking MP: 4
Running MP: 6
Jumping MP: 0
Heat Sinks: 17 Double [34] 15 7.00
Gyro: 4 3.00
Cockpit, Life Supt., Sensors: 5 3.00
L: Sh+UA+LA R: Sh+UA+LA 6 0.00
Armor Factor: 220 Light Ferro-Fibrous 7 13.00
(Armor Crit Loc: 4 LA, 2 LL, 1 RL)

Internal Armor
Structure Value
Head: 3 9
Center Torso: 23 33
Center Torso (Rear): 12
L/R Side Torso: 16 25/25
L/R Side Torso (Rear): 6/6
L/R Arm: 12 22/22
L/R Leg: 16 30/30

Weapons and Equipment Loc Heat Ammo Crits Mass
---------------------------------------------------------
1 Streak SRM 6 CT 4 15 3 5.50
(Ammo Locations: 1 LT)
1 Heavy PPC LA 15 4 10.00
1 Heavy PPC RA 15 4 10.00
CASE Equipment: LT- 0 1 0.50
---------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS: 34 1 26.00
Crits and Tons Left: 1

Calculated Factors
Total Cost: 7,196,000 C-Bill
Battle Value (BV1):1645
Battle Value (BV2):1816

Heavier firepower over the standard WHM model, and the heat sinks to maintain that advantage. However, this comes at the cost of being five tons heavier and a lack of any backup weapons beyond a Streak SRM-6. Still, it maintains the movement profile of a WHM despite the increased size, and it has more armor.
Going down the list of canonical Warhammer variants, this competes closest with the -8K model. The Godhammer lacks C3 and has a more limited reload capacity for its missiles; at the same time it has better heat efficiency when firing all weapons or moving and firing the Heavy PPCs. The armoring of the Godhammmer and this particular Warhammer variant is about identical, but this variant costs more.
Are these tradeoffs worth it? That's for you to decide.
CrayModerator
12/18/18 06:29 PM
97.101.136.19

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
Daring name, and serious firepower. I like the improvements over the 70-ton version: more armor and heat sinks.

I've managed a twin HPPC version on 70 tons with a bit more weapons, but it's under-sinked and runs hot.
Mike Miller, Materials Engineer

Disclaimer: Anything stated in this post is unofficial and non-canon unless directly quoted from a published book. Random internet musings of a BattleTech writer are not canon.
Pages: 1
Extra information
1 registered and 228 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Nic Jansma, Cray, Frabby, BobTheZombie 

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Topic views: 2250


Contact Admins Sarna.net