Aerospace Fighter: Defender

Pages: 1
Karagin
07/17/02 07:05 PM
63.173.170.74

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
code:
AeroTech 2 Vessel Technical Readout
VALIDATED

Class/Model/Name: Defender
Tech: Inner Sphere / 3067
Vessel Type: Aerospace Fighter
Rules: Level 2, Standard design

Mass: 70 tons
Power Plant: 140 Fusion
Safe Thrust: 4
Maximum Thrust: 6
Armor Type: Ferro-aluminum
Armament:
2 Gauss Rifle
1 LRM 20+Artemis IV
2 ER Medium Laser
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Class/Model/Name: Defender
Mass: 70 tons

Equipment: Mass
Power Plant: 5.00
Thrust: Safe Thrust: 4
Maximum Thrust: 6
Structural Integrity: 7 .00
Total Heat Sinks: 10 Double .00
Fuel: 3.00
Cockpit & Attitude Thrusters: 3.00
Armor Type: Ferro-aluminum (161 total armor pts) 9.00
Standard Scale Armor Pts
Location: L / R
Fore: 41
Left/Right Wings: 40/40
Aft: 40


Weapons and Equipment Loc SRV MRV LRV ERV Heat Mass
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2 Gauss Rifle Nose 15 15 15 -- 2 30.00
Ammo (Gauss) 32 --- 4.00
1 LRM 20+Artemis IV Nose 16 16 16 -- 6 11.00
Ammo (LRM 20) 18 --- 3.00
1 ER Medium Laser LW 5 5 -- -- 5 1.00
1 ER Medium Laser RW 5 5 -- -- 5 1.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS: Heat: 18 70.00
Tons Left: .00

Calculated Factors:
Total Cost: 4,090,005 C-Bills
Battle Value: 1,657
Cost per BV: 2,468.32
Weapon Value: 1,994 (Ratio = 1.20)
Damage Factors: SRV = 51; MRV = 40; LRV = 13; ERV = 0
BattleForce2: MP: 4N, Armor/Structure: 4 / 0
Damage PB/M/L: 4/5/5, Overheat: 0
Class: FH; Point Value: 17

Karagin

Given time and plenty of paper, a philosopher can prove anything.
NathanKell
07/17/02 11:27 PM
24.44.238.62

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
Nice way to capitalize on thresholds with those weapons!
You could probably squeeze more performance by going energy-only (since HS don't take up space), but you'd lose your 15pt slugs for 10s. Not that many fighters mount over 100pts armor in any one location.
Like, for example, 3x ER PPC and 13 more DHS. Or 2x ER PPC, 1x ERLL, 4 more ERML, and 11 more DHS.
And I'd certainly beef up the for'ard armor, and maximize threshing: how about 62/34/31. Your thresholds stay the same, but you have more armor on the nose (where it's most needed).

But, if it's another RL conversion (was there a CW Defender fighter?), consider that a post-production upgrade.

And I *really* like how HMA is coming along...
-NathanKell, BT Space Wars
Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear.
Thomas Jefferson
Karagin
07/17/02 11:31 PM
63.173.170.216

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
Damn! I had similar ideas my self...yes this is another RL conversion...I will give your ideas a variant or two for the Defender...

Thanks HMA is coming along and I rank it as one of the best.
Karagin

Given time and plenty of paper, a philosopher can prove anything.
NathanKell
07/28/02 04:59 PM
24.44.238.62

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
On a second look:
(and yes, this would probably triple the price) go to a 210XL and add .5t armor (maximizing thresholds).
-NathanKell, BT Space Wars
Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear.
Thomas Jefferson
Pages: 1
Extra information
0 registered and 14 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Nic Jansma, Cray, Frabby, BobTheZombie 

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Topic views: 2579


Contact Admins Sarna.net