JES II Strategic Missile Carrier

Pages: 1
Greyslayer
07/18/02 08:30 AM
216.14.192.226

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
Is this the most ugly vehicle in the battletech universe?

Well there are those appalling Clan vehicles which this seems in the same vein of. Hmmmm gone are the nice lines of the Pegasus or the square J Edgar eh?

Greyslayer
Karagin
07/18/02 09:02 AM
63.173.170.1

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
Where is the link to look at this one???
Karagin

Given time and plenty of paper, a philosopher can prove anything.
Greyslayer
07/18/02 09:07 AM
216.14.192.226

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
I've been getting my info before you by just looking up www.battletech.net. No need to be spammed by all that unnecessary advertising of the WK site or my aversion to the CBT site

Greyslayer ... finds ways to remain informed
Karagin
07/18/02 09:33 AM
63.173.170.1

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
Okay cool...I got the actually site... JES II SMC

And the darn thing looks like a WW2 German halftrack with missile on it...or more akin to something I would expect to see in Warhammer 40K not anything related to BT...oh well another reason NOT to buy the new toys.
Karagin

Given time and plenty of paper, a philosopher can prove anything.
novakitty
07/18/02 09:38 AM
209.242.100.230

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
Which movement traits does it get, tracked or wheeled (due to having both)??
meow
Karagin
07/18/02 09:41 AM
63.173.170.1

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
Odds are it get's tracked...but hey it wouldn't suprise me if it got a special bonus for being a half track like vehicle...funny thing is as a military unit, well as far as real life goes, the half track was a middle of the road vehicle...more of a prime mover then anything else and it really set the stage for APCs to come into being...but don't want to muddy the water with facts and such...
Karagin

Given time and plenty of paper, a philosopher can prove anything.
Greyslayer
07/18/02 09:41 AM
216.14.192.226

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
It probably moves like a shopping trolley if that helps

Greyslayer
Spartan
07/18/02 11:09 AM
172.145.212.106

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
Hover.

And what numbskull decided to mount 6 LRM20's on the thing? How much ammo would it be able to carry? And who would use this unit if you had to spend a large amount of your force just to protect it? You may as well as try to recreate one of Hitler's super guns that drained away entire battlalions from the real fight.
Spartan

We demand rigidly defined areas of doubt and uncertainty.

(I refer you to what Nightward said)
Greyslayer
07/18/02 11:21 AM
216.14.192.226

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
its not the idea of having such firepower on the one unit but rather the physical placement of the weapons (weight on the wheels rather than the track and so on). Also the back blast would affect the tracks/engine compartment the way it is designed. Most rocket/missile launcher designs don't do this and having served in an Armoured unit myself I would hate to bash track* everytime I fired the main gun.

*Bash Track is a common armoured term for putting new sections of track links in the track to replace older damaged ones (in this case because rubber pads were damaged or the bushes that hold the track pins in with are perished).

This would be the same concept vehicle type as having a sphere-shaped combat submarine rather than cylinder-shaped one ... poor design.

Greyslayer
NathanKell
07/18/02 01:42 PM
24.44.238.62

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
Indeed only things like the Ancient Bombard (i.e. Ishtar) come close.

Gah.
-NathanKell, BT Space Wars
Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason, than that of blind-folded fear.
Thomas Jefferson
deleteme
07/21/02 11:04 PM
128.118.101.151

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
6 lrm 20's?? I only count 4
Karagin
07/22/02 01:05 PM
65.129.165.203

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
Read the fluff...
Karagin

Given time and plenty of paper, a philosopher can prove anything.
ChalengerII
07/22/02 06:31 PM
62.254.0.4

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
I agree with greyslayer this is a realy realy err(Thinks hard for a word bad enought which isn't rude/swearing etc) awful looking vehicle. The only thing it reminds me of is an 40k orc battlewaggon
deleteme
07/22/02 11:53 PM
128.118.101.145

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
count the lrms on the figure
Karagin
07/23/02 12:12 AM
63.173.170.178

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
I did...and the fluff gives it more...so once again we have fluff and figure not matching...that is nothing but kind surprising given all the "prefection" MWDA is suppose to have over BT...
Karagin

Given time and plenty of paper, a philosopher can prove anything.
deleteme
07/23/02 01:48 AM
128.118.101.145

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
ya, that was my initial implication
Pages: 1
Extra information
2 registered and 114 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Nic Jansma, Cray, Frabby, BobTheZombie 

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is enabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Topic views: 5728


Contact Admins Sarna.net