Dragon HAAAV

Pages: 1 | 2 | >> (show all)
Karagin
07/10/13 09:03 PM
72.178.85.122

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
Code:
           BattleTech Vehicle Technical Readout
VALIDATED

Type/Model: Dragon HAAAV
Tech: Inner Sphere / 3060
Config: Tracked Vehicle
Rules: Level 3, Standard design

Mass: 75 tons
Power Plant: 225 Kurenwor XL Fusion
Cruise Speed: 32.4 km/h
Maximum Speed: 54.0 km/h
Armor Type: Ulston 105 Ferro-Fibrous
Armament:
5 Para-Ordance Rotary AC/2s
Manufacturer: Naysmith Machine Tools
Location: Katanga, Terra
Communications System: O/P 3000 COMSET
Targeting & Tracking System: O/P 3000

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
==Overview:==
The Dragon HAAAV is not a pure front line comabt unit, it is a
support/defensive unit. Mission is to take down low fly aerospace units and
conventional aircraft and VTOLs. That doesn't mean it is not an excellent fire
support platform.

Once the bridgehead on Remagin 3 was secure New Terran Republic forces began
to breakout of their postions and slowly started to push Blake forces back
into the hinterlands of Remagin 3. Fighting became very close and personal, as
ambush and hit and run attacks replaced battels of manuever and envolpe.

Seeing the need for a heavy fire suppression vehicle the NTR commanders began
to use their air defense vehicles like the Dragon to provide the high volume
of fire needed to keep Blakist on the run. NTR ground troops loved having
these vehicles around and the requests for their firepower far out paced their
numbers on the ground.

Once the fighting on Remagin 3 was finished, the NTR began to work a version
of the Dragon that was able to do both missions without losing any fire power,
currently testing is still underway.

--------------------------------------------------------
Type/Model: Dragon HAAAV
Mass: 75 tons
Construction Options: Fractional Accounting

Equipment: Items Mass
Int. Struct.: 40 pts Standard 0 7.50
Engine: 225 XL Fusion 2 5.00
Shielding & Transmission Equipment: 0 2.50
Cruise MP: 3
Flank MP: 5
Heat Sinks: 10 Single 0 .00
Cockpit & Controls: 0 3.75
Crew: 5 Members 0 .00
Turret Equipment: 0 4.00
Armor Factor: 147 pts Ferro-Fibrous 2 8.20

Internal Armor
Structure Value
Front: 8 30
Left / Right Sides: 8 30/30
Rear: 8 25
Turret: 8 32

Weapons and Equipment Loc Heat Ammo Items Mass
--------------------------------------------------------
5 Rotary AC/2s Turret 0 90 6 42.00
1 C.A.S.E. Equipment Body 1 .50
Fire Control Radar Body 1 1.55
--------------------------------------------------------
TOTALS: 0 12 75.00
Items & Tons Left: 8 .00

Calculated Factors:
Total Cost: 10,023,125 C-Bills
Battle Value 2: 1,119 (old BV = 780)
Cost per BV: 8,957.22
Weapon Value: 651 / 651 (Ratio = .58 / .58)
Damage Factors: SRDmg = 36; MRDmg = 25; LRDmg = 10
BattleForce2: MP: 3T, Armor/Structure: 0 / 6
Damage PB/M/L: 3/3/3, Overheat: 0
Class: GH; Point Value: 11

Karagin

Given time and plenty of paper, a philosopher can prove anything.
Karagin
02/02/14 10:35 PM
24.243.178.124

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
And up to the top it goes...
Karagin

Given time and plenty of paper, a philosopher can prove anything.
Retry
02/02/14 11:06 PM
72.214.204.166

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
At full throttle your tank here has a grand total endurance of...

...

...3 turns...

Well at least ammo explosions are a thing of the past?
Karagin
02/02/14 11:14 PM
24.243.178.124

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
And you forget the idea of ammo carriers like the J27s or a similar vehicle.
Karagin

Given time and plenty of paper, a philosopher can prove anything.
Retry
02/02/14 11:24 PM
72.214.204.166

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
I do not forget, but too much dependency is bad on logistics and makes such carriers easy, juicy targets.
ghostrider
02/02/14 11:24 PM
66.27.181.51

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
too expensive. thought it would be good about doing criticals on an advancing tank battalion.
Karagin
02/02/14 11:25 PM
24.243.178.124

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
10 million is to much? Interesting.
Karagin

Given time and plenty of paper, a philosopher can prove anything.
Retry
02/02/14 11:28 PM
72.214.204.166

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
You could drop a RAC and make it a fuel cell to make it less ludicrous.
Karagin
02/02/14 11:32 PM
24.243.178.124

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
I like it with the fusion engine, it has work well in about dozen fights so really no need to change it.
Karagin

Given time and plenty of paper, a philosopher can prove anything.
Retry
02/02/14 11:34 PM
72.214.204.166

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
Until you lose one to, say, anything, and have to pay an arm and a leg.
Karagin
02/02/14 11:36 PM
24.243.178.124

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
I don't see 10 million as an arm or a leg, so not to worried about losing one.
Karagin

Given time and plenty of paper, a philosopher can prove anything.
ghostrider
02/02/14 11:37 PM
66.27.181.51

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
To my knowledge, (and thats old knowledge) a 75 ton mech is cheaper to purchase then the tank is.
I think an innersphere kraken would do about the same with costing less, but haven't sat down to figure it out.
Retry
02/02/14 11:37 PM
72.214.204.166

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
I'd rather have 2 vees with 4 of these weapons than 1 with 5
Karagin
02/02/14 11:47 PM
24.243.178.124

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
I would need to check that as well Ghostrider. And Retry if you want 2 with four then go that route.
Karagin

Given time and plenty of paper, a philosopher can prove anything.
Retry
02/02/14 11:50 PM
72.214.204.166

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
You clearly love overpriced tanks, why not upgrade to XXL?
ghostrider
02/02/14 11:52 PM
66.27.181.51

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
atn loves overpriced tanks.

I keep forgetting the newer items that came out. It may not be close anymore.
Retry
02/02/14 11:54 PM
72.214.204.166

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
ATN loves oversized tanks.

Karagin loves overpriced tanks.
ghostrider
02/02/14 11:54 PM
66.27.181.51

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
if your stats are right on your firedrake, it is around 4.5 mil. I will check any other designs posted here as well.
Retry
02/03/14 12:07 AM
72.214.204.166

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
Wait a minute

You would not mind losing this 10 million easy target, but a 4 mill Mirage helicopter from Hell is too much for your taste?
Karagin
02/03/14 06:26 AM
24.243.178.124

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
I never said a 4 million VTOL was too much, I am saying that 10 million to a military for a unit is not considered a crazy amount and losing it is part of the risk of being in war.

And the price of an XXL engine is too high even for my ideas of what a military is going to risk, sometimes the cool and wow are weighed against an outrageous cost and the XXL engine is one of those things. And again if you can build the vehicle for less KEEPING the 5 RACs and the same armor and speed then please Retry show us your skills and build it.
Karagin

Given time and plenty of paper, a philosopher can prove anything.
Retry
02/03/14 09:51 AM
72.214.204.166

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
Your specifications are ludicrous but it should be finished by the end of today.
ghostrider
02/03/14 12:46 PM
66.27.181.51

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
You suggested having 2 vehicles and a fuel cell over one vehicle, retry.
Show Karagin up by making it work
Retry
02/03/14 01:39 PM
72.214.204.166

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
No, I said I would rather have 2 vees, he says keep it as 1 somehow.
CrayModerator
02/03/14 07:22 PM
71.47.122.85

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
Quote:
Until you lose one to, say, anything, and have to pay an arm and a leg.



If it's a government vehicle, then it's not that much of a problem after 3050 (or before 2800).
Mike Miller, Materials Engineer

Disclaimer: Anything stated in this post is unofficial and non-canon unless directly quoted from a published book. Random internet musings of a BattleTech writer are not canon.
CrayModerator
02/03/14 07:26 PM
71.47.122.85

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
Quote:
You clearly love overpriced tanks, why not upgrade to XXL?



XXLs are experimental and hard to find. After 3050 to 3060, XLs are common enough for an elite government force's tanks. A merc might avoid this, but there's no reason for a government with a budget in the quadrillions of CB to avoid a 10 million CB tank. The bottleneck for government military growth in the 31st Century is vehicle/'Mech production capacity, not individual components or budget. When you're building a limited number of regiments per year, get the best that's available and supportable.
Mike Miller, Materials Engineer

Disclaimer: Anything stated in this post is unofficial and non-canon unless directly quoted from a published book. Random internet musings of a BattleTech writer are not canon.
His_Most_Royal_Highass_Donkey
02/03/14 07:34 PM
172.56.15.163

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
I can understand how mechs can be hard to come by but tanks should be easy to come by because they are not so complicated to build. If you can build civilian tracked tractors you should be able to make tanks of a sort.
Why argue if the glass is half full or half empty, when you know someone is going to knock it over and spill it anyways.

I was a Major *pain* before
But I got a promotion.
I am now a General *pain*
Yay for promotions!!!
Retry
02/03/14 09:06 PM
67.239.109.174

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
If a government has the money to waste XL engines they may as well waste the XL engines on better designs that aren't made of tin.

At a bit more than half the cost, this design has more armor, an armored chassis and CASE II for safety, and the same everything else as he requested.

Dakkamaster RAC2 Carrier
IS experimental
95 tons
BV: 1,353
Cost: 5,332,275 C-bills

Movement: 3/5 (Tracked)
Engine: 285 Fuel Cell

Internal: 50
Armor: 224 (Ferro-Fibrous)
Internal Armor
Front 10 54
Right 10 45
Left 10 45
Rear 10 30
Turret 10 50

Weapons Loc Heat
Rotary AC/2 TU 1
Rotary AC/2 TU 1
Rotary AC/2 TU 1
Rotary AC/2 TU 1
Rotary AC/2 TU 1

Ammo Loc Shots
Rotary AC/2 Ammo BD 45
Rotary AC/2 Ammo BD 45

Equipment Loc
Armored Chassis BD
CASE II BD
Karagin
02/03/14 09:23 PM
24.243.178.124

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
You built it 20 tons heavier, kind of defeats the point really.
Karagin

Given time and plenty of paper, a philosopher can prove anything.
Retry
02/03/14 09:37 PM
67.239.109.174

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
Those 20 tons aren't going to affect it's ability to be carried in a dropship.
Those 20 tons aren't going to cause it to sink into some random extra terrain.
Those 20 tons aren't going to limit it's terrain traversing abilities.
Those 20 tons aren't really hurting it. At all.
What is it the point that is beaten by those 20 tons?(And more importantly, if tonnage is a issue why not DOWNSIZE?!?!)
Karagin
02/03/14 09:38 PM
24.243.178.124

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
So where is the 75 ton version that does all of that Retry? Building a bigger version doesn't prove it's better, the challenge was for you to build the SAME vehicle at the same tonnage with all of the same weapons, armor etc...not add 20 tons of stuff to it, so can you build the same vehicle for the same tonnage etc...with your idea or not?
Karagin

Given time and plenty of paper, a philosopher can prove anything.
Pages: 1 | 2 | >> (show all)
Extra information
0 registered and 109 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Nic Jansma, Cray, Frabby, BobTheZombie 

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Topic views: 12598


Contact Admins Sarna.net