Category talk:Reseen

Disagree With Deletion[edit]

If there are two definitions of Reseen, we should include both definitions. Deleting the whole category is just extreme. GOLFisNOTaSPORT (talk) 04:04, 18 August 2014 (PDT)

I also strongly disagree. Well, actually I disagree with the deletion of the Reseen article. The category I don't care about as much. A list of Reseen mechs is needed just as much as the list of Unseen mechs is. The Reseen are clearly listed in Project Phoenix and they are featured prominently in the Mechwarrior Online MMO. The article has been on here for years but now Frabby comes along and says all the Reseen stuff is "outright false." How so? --Trifler (talk) 05:46, 18 August 2014 (PDT)
Well, for starters, there is no official definition of "Reseen" as it's a fan term. What this category currently does is simply list all 'Mechs from TRO:PP, and I guess I just don't quite see what the point of that is. If you want a category of TRO:PP 'Mechs fine, but then I'd call it by that name for clarity. Frabby (talk) 07:32, 18 August 2014 (PDT)
There are clearly more 'Mechs in the category than just those in TRO:PP. GOLFisNOTaSPORT (talk) 15:59, 18 August 2014 (PDT)
After you remove the Phoenix designs, there are exactly three 'Mechs and one vehicle, in their original forms, that have returned from Unseen status: Ostscout, Ostsol, Ostroc, and Galleon (3058). I suggest deleting this category and simply going with Project Phoenix and Unseen categories for clarity. If you must keep this category, please add/modify categories to differentiate between "Reseen-Return" and "Reseen-Project Phoenix."Cache (talk) 21:19, 10 November 2014 (PST)