Talk:Clan Star Adder

This article is within the scope of the Project Clans, a collaborative effort to improve BattleTechWiki's coverage of Clans. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

Multiple reversions to new Bloodnames format

Afternoon, 64.136.252.163.

I'm reverting your (presumed) 3rd edit of Clan Star Adder back to the previous state, as this particular article is leading the way forward in how the Bloodnames are going to be presented on Sarna. While some of the other Clan articles have not yet been advanced to the new presentation format, the intent is there and we didn't want to hold CSA back until all 20 Clans have had their data compiled. If you wish to assist in advancing the other Clan articles, please reach out to Deadfire on his talk page or on the Discord server. Thanks for your interest. --Revanche ^{(talk|contribs)} 16:27, 25 August 2021 (EDT)

The new blood names format is clunky and inefficient. There’s no reason a clan page shouldn’t list their founding blood names.— The preceding unsigned comment was posted by 64.136.252.163 (talk • contribs) 17:11, 25 August 2021‎.

Until this is resolved, we will be sticking with the community consensus on the issue. If you feel invested in discussing it further, you may do so now (and here).

Just to bring you up to speed with our wiki community, we tend to discuss major changes and come to a consensus, rather than act with the power of the one. That's why your reversions have been so quickly rendered ineffective. Here is where you can make an argument why your perspective is preferable over that of the present consensus, make suggestions on a compromise, and even develop a sample plan of action with those who you are able to convince to work with you. Good luck! (And please remember to "sign" your talk page posts, as per the welcome bulletin I provided you on your talk page.) --Revanche ^{(talk|contribs)} 18:47, 25 August 2021 (EDT)

where is the community consensus? Where is it discussed and who decided it? — The preceding unsigned comment was posted by 64.136.252.163 (talk • contribs) 12:38, 12 October 2021‎ .

There is a link to the project at the top of the article. Can't miss it.--Cache (talk) 12:53, 12 October 2021 (EDT)