Sarna News: BattleTechGear.com

Talk:Gorgon (DropShip class)

This article is within the scope of the Spacecraft WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve BattleTechWiki's coverage of DropShips, JumpShips and Warships. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

Introduction Date[edit]

Hello, the TRO introduction date show the Class was introduced in 3096, however the offical MUL listing for the Gorgon is 3104. Please hold off "fixing" the date of intro until we hear back from our friends at the CGL. MUL sometimes is more wrong than right sometimes. -- Wrangler (talk) 18:42, 29 August 2013 (PDT)

Grrr, i know, we have so many inconsitence infos, CGL dos is my feeling not the job their a publisher must do, when i look on the errata section on the forum i can cry, but thanks Wrangler to add this note.--Doneve (talk) 18:50, 29 August 2013 (PDT)
Well, there update of sorts. CGL staff are investigating the problem. Once they get back to us with it, we'll know which date the right one since now the Seleucus is also having same problem. -- Wrangler (talk) 20:00, 30 August 2013 (PDT)
The best thing to do if there's an inconsistency with anything is to put it up in the Ask The Writers forum, I find - I ask loads of questions about small stuff, because if nothing else I'm flagging up that there's an inconsistencty, and it if inconsistencies keep cropping up in the same kind of area, it may be a systematic fault or problem that we can't see from outside but they can. BrokenMnemonic (talk) 01:56, 31 August 2013 (PDT)
Looks like we got answer. On the writer forums, that it was determined that 3096 date is the correct date and the MUL Profile has changed accordingly. Now we only have wait for the Seleucus be fixed. I had strong feeling the TRO was going to be write. I've noticed alot of MUL entries that seem to be cut & past sort feel in comparison to others. However, the 'Mech entries and other ones without actual dates in the original article themselves are going be unchange able due to dates being left out of the original write ups. -- Wrangler (talk) 05:36, 31 August 2013 (PDT)