Talk:Janos Marik

Article Material[edit]

Meh. Felt like such a classic character deserved a lot more. Janos was the classic case of an over-sensitive idealist who gets thrown into the fire and gets burned. He's like Victor with a worse military track record.

I know I cheated a bit, using the same material I used for Anton Marik to describe the civil war. I'll probably come back to this again soon. ClanWolverine101

There's no reason not to re-use material, as long as they are not related in the sense of being off-shoots of a main article (e.g., Clans and then Clan Blood Spirit). If they are two equal articles (like Anton and Janos are), and the same material relates to each other individually, then sure. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 00:39, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
I did the same thing for my article on the Marik Civil War. Is that okay? ClanWolverine101

Anton picture[edit]

Why is Anton's picture in this article about Janos? It seems to me, that if someone wanted to learn something about Anton, they could easuily click on that link. Having a picture where the subject of the picture is not the subject of the article seems...odd to me.--Revanche (talk|contribs) 00:39, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

I deleted but Jherbert added to???.Doneve 00:41, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
Actually, I find Anton's picture in the Marik Civil War section to be consistent. The MCW was an underrated period of the history, and it was definitely critical in the history of this character. I've seen other articles that have pics inserted not because they directly depict the subject, but rather their relevance to the section of the article. I vote we keep it in. (And no, I didn't add it.) ClanWolverine101
I did it and my reason is exactly what Wolverine said. Anton was an extremely important influence over Jaons' life. ROM secrets 14:16, 7 March 2010 (UTC)