Talk:Military Ranks

Is there a source for that 3025 rank equivalency table? If it's not actually directly FROM something it's got some problems that need fixing (for example: the General of the Armies is equivalent to a Field Marshal? The rank "Marshal of the Armies" didn't exist in 3025, so why is it on there? Why is First Prince not on top?) — The preceding unsigned comment was provided by 71.34.112.31 (talkcontribs) on 24 September 2011.

I've never seen it in any actual sourcebooks. It's similar to the one that was in the back of the BoK novels, but the BoK one was from 3049 and had the AFFC ranks, not LCAF/AFFS. It should probably be replaced, IMO.

CO[edit]

Why isn't there a page for Commanding Officers? Isn't that a rank (and a fairly notable one, at that)? I think that it at least warrants a page of its own. -BobTheZombie (talk) 17:36, 26 November 2013 (PST)

The commanding officer is not a rank, its a subject.--Doneve (talk) 19:00, 26 November 2013 (PST)

Comparative Rank Table[edit]

Does this display properly for everyone else? It goes off the screen for me with no way of seeing missing part. Dark Jaguar (talk) 04:56, 29 May 2016 (PDT)

It does the same for me; on my phone I was temporarily able to scroll sideways but that stopped working. My mouse's sidescrolling buttons didn't work, but zooming out seems to be the only way to see it. I'm not one that's good at working with the tables, so maybe Mbear or Revanche or BM could help more. -BobTheZombie (talk) 09:52, 29 May 2016 (PDT)
I figured out that if you're on a phone and replace the "www" in the url with "m" you can see the tables much easier and can scroll all the way over. I don't know if that helps. -BobTheZombie (talk) 12:03, 19 June 2016 (PDT)