Talk:Neveron

Contents

[edit]

I've edited the article to sound less like an advertisement for Neveron. I'm unclear whether it was the express intent of the staff at this website to make it so, or some rogue editor pitching whatever they wanted, but I'm going to assume it shouldn't be so. Ritifo 14:41, 26 March 2007 (PST)

Looks good, I agree with your edits. Nicjansma 00:33, 27 March 2007 (CDT)

[edit] The HoC Archive

24.17.223.10 posted a link in the External Links section of Neveron to a product that is related to Neveron. On one hand, the item may provide elaboration of the online game, but on the other hand, it is inaccessible to review by other editors unless it is purchased (which reduces both its verifiability and relevance dramatically). Coupled with the fact that the editor has no other edits on the site, prior to this post, I'm reluctant to allow it to remain. However, I don't think that 24.17.223.10 need be painted with the 'spammer' brush. I do believe it was posted by a fan of the universe (or at least one of the game) and can be brought into the community to expand on the Neveron material. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 19:38, 11 December 2007 (CST)

My C0.02 (.02 C-Bills) is that perhaps it should be provided under "References" as it's a book for sale. While it's not an "External Reference" since it can't be independently (and freely) verified, I do think would fall into the "References" section (per examples on Wiki). Bdevoe 17:32, 19 December 2007 (CST)
Well, since I agree with you and we're the only two respondents, consensus has been reached. I'll make the change. Thanks for the idea. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 07:53, 2 January 2008 (CST)
Heh. I like those kinds of discussions. :) Bdevoe 15:29, 2 January 2008 (CST)
Agree...quite productive. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 08:03, 3 January 2008 (CST)
Actually I am who added that link. The hoc archive is down because I am final editing it so more former Nev players appear in it. And no its not "inacessible to review unless it is purchased" there is a free pdf. The book is only for those that want a real book. But thats all beside the point. Its been removed.--Superjuke

[edit] Log In delays

While patrolling Recent Changes, I decided to follow up on the entry made by IP 67.193.61.0‎ reporting log-in delays, and attempted to make it neutral, with a newspaper-reporting/just-the-facts style. I also added a {{cn}} tag, since -as far as I know- only one person is experiencing these delays. If there exists a forum thread where numerous people are reporting similar experiences, I think replacing the {{cn}} with a link would be appropriate.--Revanche (talk|contribs) 21:43, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Should Nevron be here?

Nevron is a unofficial/unlicenced commercial computer game INSPIRED by the Battletech universe not part of it so should it be here on BTW? --Dmon 14:31, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Its battletech related. I personnally think it should be mentioned. We could setup a seperate section or have a tag that says. Battletech Related or Battletech Based on the game. I think it should stay, but have information stating its based on BT. -- Wrangler 18:02, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Per the policy to allow anything BT related, it should. Also, Neveron is /closely/ associated with Sarna (in its pre-BTW incarnation) and Sarna's forum. There may be even some hosting history involved. However, if we did not have a fanon allowance here, Neveron would indeed not make the cut.--Revanche (talk|contribs) 22:36, 24 August 2009 (UTC)