Talk:Random Assignment Tables

Sources[edit]

This article would be much more informative if it included which products had RATs provided.--Revanche (talk|contribs) 19:34, 10 August 2015 (PDT)

Disagree. Or perhaps I just don't understand why you want a list of RATs. Each RAT stands for itself and its scope and usefulness is limited to the product it is published in. They don't interact, nor does the combined content of all published RATs have any meaningful information unto itself. That's the whole problem with those RATs, after all. So what use would a list be that essentially just lists all major sourcebooks, all Turning Points products, all BattleCorps Stable Reports, and a few others? Frabby (talk) 03:09, 11 August 2015 (PDT)