Talk:Record Sheets: 3075 Unabridged

Second note[edit]

The 2nd note in the Notes section is very unclear to me. If anyone else can decipher it, please do. Otherwise, it is not informative and should be deleted. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 01:09, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

I'll try to clear this up. Just recently, a newly printed version of 3075 record sheets came out. Unabridged one has variants of TRO:3075 in it, while the printed version does not. The note was suppose to explain the difference between the two books. It partially explaination why these two produces should NOT be merged. They are related, but differient enough warrent seperate entry. -- Wrangler 01:36, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
I'm all for explaining 'reasons' before they become an issue, so good on you. And the nd note is definitely more clarified and understandable now; going to make some changes to structure, as when I read it out loud, I can still see errors. Thanks for the quick fix. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 02:44, 29 March 2010 (UTC)


Hy, can everyone tell me, why the cost on various BattleMech and ASF...articles on the wiki (i found a lot of it), divers with the published Record Sheet data. --Doneve 18:51, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Don't Know, but it could be a errant (error) that got by the writers who printed them out. In the 'Mech & Vehicles articles I did, I was using putting the costs i found in the TROs and not from the Record Sheets themselves. There have been large number of problems with the record sheets lately, because they are being done by hand instead of using a computer program. -- Wrangler 19:39, 28 May 2010 (UTC)