Talk:Richard Calderon (2)

(2) or II[edit]

just out of curiosity is this Richard Caldron the second (roman numerals are traditionally used thus making this article Richard Calderon II) or is there another reason for the (2) after his name that I do not understand? --Dmon 07:02, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

There is a Richard Calderon who was Protector durring the early part of the Age of War 2360. This article deals with the Richard Calderon of the 3060's who was not a Protector. The only source that listed this Richard did not use the roman numerals and with the vast length of time between the two I chose instead to designate them by (1) and (2).Deeppockets 14:54, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
OK placeholder redone...THIS page needs to be deleted and I have to get on the road because I am late for work! Please delete Richard Calderon (2) and/or redirect links to Richard calderon, Civil War Era.Deeppockets 22:35, 26 June 2010 (UTC)