User talk:ClanWolverine101/Archive 2010

Sign[edit]

As a courtesy for other editors, it is a BattleTechWiki guideline to sign your talk page and user talk page posts. To do so simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name (or IP address, if you are editing anonymously) and the date will be automatically added along with a timestamp. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). For further info see the talk page guidelines. Thank you.



ClanWolverine101, please /do/ sign your comments on talk pages. If you don't, someone (usually me), has to do the research to find out who it was that made the comment. Thank you. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 05:02, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Apologies - I missed the appropriate command to do so. I'll reread your protocols. ClanWolverine101

Cosara Weaponries[edit]

Evening, ClanWolverine101. I saw your removal of the statement regarding Cosara Weaponries from the Northwind Highlanders article. Because I don't want to discourage a new Editor, especially one working so hard as you, I'm not gonna dispute that, but it is generally our policy to post a {{citation needed}} tag after something that doesn't seem right to you. That way, multiple Editors have the opportunity to research the fact, rather than just losing the information. If someone hasn't updated the statement with a verifiable citation, then you are free to delete it. That tag, and others, can be found in the left-side column in the Template gallery. Thanks. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 02:08, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Understood, and thank you. I started having second thoughts about my original note, thinking maybe it was in regards to the Cosara factories on Terra, not Northwind that I was thinking of. Regardless, I would not have zapped it arbitrarily if it had been someone else's posting.ClanWolverine101
Smiley.gif Really? Good thing I didn't roll you back again. I didn't know you had posted it. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 04:06, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
Well, shoot - I'd never just delete a section of someone else's work without at least sticking something specific in the discussion page. When I think something is incorrect, I usually just post to "Talk", and see if I get a response. ClanWolverine101

Random Act of Appreciation Award[edit]

ClanWolverine101, I grant you the Random Act of Appreciation Award for your numerous improvement edits this past weekend, especially in regards to cleaning up citations, such as those you made to 145th Jaguar Regulars (Clan Smoke Jaguar):

Random Act of Appreciation Award, 1st ribbon

I took the liberty of adding an awards board to your main page. You might want to check your user count and self-award yourself an Edit Count ribbon after a few more edits. Thanks. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 01:56, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Thank you!!! ClanWolverine101
And thank YOU!Deeppockets 04:33, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Notable Pilots Project[edit]

So something I'm planning on focusing on is hitting all the 'VIP' type bios and listing what mechs they were known to use, in the standard section. Conversely, I would go to the mech pages and add the 'VIP' types as 'Notable Pilots'. Does this sound good? ClanWolverine101

Yep. But it would have to be a really notable person, because we don't want to spam the 'Mech entries with pilot names. Most "notable pilots" from the TROs are in fact nobodies who may get their own IC character entry on BTW, but do not deserve a mention as a notable pilot. Further, I feel (but this is just my personal opinion) that the 'Mech and its notable pilot should be identified with each other to some notable degree. Natasha Kerensky and her Warhammer are an immediate match; by contrast, Sun Tzu Liao piloted numerous designs at various points but is not really associated with any particular 'Mech. Frabby 21:12, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Oh, I agree. When I say 'notable pilots' I do mean significant characters from the novels and such, who actually had a connection to the machine. Sun-Tzu was never much of a mechwarrior, so I wouldn't bother with him at all. ClanWolverine101

Mechforce Quarterly[edit]

I gather from your question at Talk:Hansen's_Roughriders that you were a member of the MFNA for a time at least, and also have the magazines? May I kindly request that you look over my MechForce article and check if you can add something, and perhaps also create the articles on MechForce North America, 'Mech (magazine) and MechForce Quarterly which are redlinked so far. Frabby 20:38, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

How I wish I could. :( Sadly, they are in a box in a pile of boxes in a closet in a basement in parent's house 1,000 miles away. I probably would have needed help referencing the article. Its just that when I read the entry that the Roughriders never fought in the clan invasion, I suddenly remembered that scenario. I miss the old magazine, though. I even got paid $20 for a submitted scenario. Don't think they ran it though. Maybe I could hunt those mags down eventually. ClanWolverine101

Setting up a redirect[edit]

Eighth Sword of Light

8th Sword of Light

(copied from Talk page)

Question : In many of the source materials this is referred to as the Treaty of Tukayyid. How do i set it up so that "Treaty of Tukayyid" redirects here? ClanWolverine101

Click go the page you want to create, in this case I'll just add Treaty of Tukayyid here as there are no existing redlinks on BTW for that, when you edit that page hit the #R button along the top so it dumps in #REDIRECT[[Target page name]] and enter in the page you want the redirect to lead to, in this case #REDIRECT[[Truce of Tukayyid]] Cyc 22:33, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Minor addition on the sidelines: I added the <nowiki> tags to Cyc's explanation so that it displays the code as text instead of wikicode, for clarification. Frabby 12:06, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

SLDF Royal Links[edit]

Copied from my talk page to yours.--Mbear 12:14, 16 March 2010 (UTC) Hey Mbear - I noticed you've been adding the SLDF Royal links to all the relevant mech pages. I was wondering what TRO or other sourcebook those were from? I ask because I'd like to make the article all of those are linking to. ClanWolverine101

I found a lot of them in Technical Readout: 3075. I can't recall the exact page number, but I think it was the third or fourth page into the "Age of War" section.--Mbear 11:58, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Also The Star League sourcebook, pages 41, 61, 85, 105, and 110 talks about recruiting and policies for the SLDF Royal divisions.--Mbear 12:05, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, I'll try to bust this out soon. ClanWolverine101
If you don't have the SLDF book, let me know. I do and I can get the relevant passages to you. --Mbear 18:33, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
I got it. Just getting to it. Thanks! ClanWolverine101 19:38, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Good article! I like it a lot. Now to get the Operation: Klondike info in there once the moratorium period has ended.
P.S. I re-ordered a couple sections of the page (moved Amaris Civil War to follow Equipment). Since you have troop composition first, I thought it made more sense to have the equipment be the next thing, rather than launching into the Amaris Civil War stuff. Plus the last line of the Equipment section flowed naturally into the ACW section.--Mbear 13:45, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
Fair enough. I don't have Klondike myself, so that's all you. ClanWolverine101 14:39, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Date request[edit]

Hey, CW: this is only a request, not a mandate by any means. Can you start signing your posts the traditional way (i.e., with four tildes or using the 'sign with timestamp' button), so that readers can follow when you made them? Its not normally a big thing, but because you are much more involved in the behind-the-scenes of the wiki than most new Editors, and because you are influencing discussions, I've often been checking page history to see if a cocnern of your's is recent or older (and possibly thereby needing a response by me). Again, if its a thing of your's to not do that, roger that and I'll adapt.--Revanche (talk|contribs) 16:21, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Absolutely, I can do that. When I first started, I was told three was standard. ClanWolverine101 17:08, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
LOL...I'm sorry you were misdirected. Now you know why others have the date and it doesn't show on your's. If you like, let me know who told you and I'll let them know 4 is the standard. Thanks, though! --Revanche (talk|contribs) 18:38, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

All Purpose Award[edit]

You get the All Purpose Award

All Purpose Award, 1st ribbon

for the Waco Rangers article. --Neufeld 08:48, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! I was actually quite proud of that one. ClanWolverine101 08:55, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Neufeld beat me to granting you that Award, but I still wanted to chime in and congratulate you. This is exactly the type of articles that I want to see more of: Detailed, well-researched, well-referenced. Incidentially, I was preparing a Waco Rangers article myself (because they're among my favourite units), but I'm glad you beat me to it. I may add a few bits and pieces to the article in the future. Oh, and you're now earmarked for a nomination for the Superior Article Award (once it gets released). :) Frabby 12:06, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks! It took me longer to get to this than I had intended, but I was happy with the result. (I hope someone can post an insignia graphic for me at some point.) ClanWolverine101 12:49, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Had to see what all the hub-bub was and I, too, was impressed. I'm really glad to see an Editor doing this kind of detailed research and proud for BTW when these kind of articles get referenced elsewhere (such as CBT's forums and even eBay!). These aren't easy to do, even when just using one title. But to seek out multiple titles to get the broadest picture takes work. I'll second Frabby's nomination when the time comes.--Revanche (talk|contribs) 12:57, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
Thank you! I felt the subject matter lent itself well. We like references and footnotes? Well, that's pretty much what the Waco Rangers were. They were never featured, but whenever the writers needed an idiot villain to show up, act like an ass, get their butts kicked and then survive, there they were. They were a throw-in - the story was never about them. Their existence can easily be boiled down to some footnotes and references. ClanWolverine101 20:56, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Burned out[edit]

After I wrote this, I realized I was a bit burned out....

everybody do Manei!
Manei, Manei
Domini
Banana, Mana, Do-min-i
Fee, Fie, Moe, Mony
Manei!

...yeah.

ClanWolverine101 04:03, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

This actually got stuck in my head. Not those words, mind you...but still. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 23:45, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, huh??? ClanWolverine101 01:13, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Event : "The Wedding of Hanse Davion and Melissa Steiner"[edit]

There are so many references to this event throughout the wiki : It was the start of the 4th Succession War, the next step in the founding of FedCom, the official start of the Wolf's Dragoons / Kurita feud... I propose it deserves its on article.
Thoughts? ClanWolverine101 11:35, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Absolutely. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 11:41, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
Great!
... now I just need to actually read Book 2 of the Warrior Trilogy. :P ClanWolverine101 11:42, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
You could also start the article, based on descriptions of the event from other sources. If the 2nd book gives more detail, those could be used to enhance the article (when you're done with the book). --Revanche (talk|contribs) 11:44, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

New Page : Vesar Kristofur[edit]

Vesar Kristofur is up. As some of you may have noticed, I have a particular interest in Wolf's Dragoons and the Marik-Civil War. I *THINK* I did a good job on this one, and would appreciate any feedback. Thanks.
ClanWolverine101 05:32, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

I made some changes.
  • First off is every level 3 section heading must fall under a level 2. That was easy enough, as the relevant sections all fell under the History section, anyway.
  • Part of me notices that there is a Dragoon Mystery section, but all of the sections are related to that. If it could support it, I'd like Precentor ROM, Thar Marik Civil War and Aftermath all be level 4 sections under the Dragoon Mystery, since they are related. However, I'll leave that up to you. Legacy seems just right as a level 3.
  • Good use of citations. I think the article is well-sourced. I have removed the links to the articles in the references, as an upcoming policy seeks to make references as easy and consistent as possible. Since all cited material should be in the bibliography section (I added them where they weren't), internal links in the refs are unnecessary. When ever possible, also include the relevant page numbers and section heading (if available); it helps cuts down on the time Editors need to verify, since you already found it. Also note: the right abbreviation of page is 'p.' and plural would be 'pp.'. Look out how Frabby used "ref name" to make citations easier on the read; which is also easier on the citing Editor, if used.
  • Also, the biblio should be alphabetized. When the linked article must use a descriptor in the title, pipe the link so it only shows the title's actual name (ex: [[ComStar (sourcebook)|ComStar]]).
This was well-researched and well-written. The copyedits I listed above were just that: they made the article only marginally better. The materiel was clear and valuable and -since it spanned numerous titles- also encompassing. If there were a picture available, the article would be complete.
Right now, most Editors are seeking to get something, anything on a subject on to BTW, so searches are rewarded with actual content. Your level of effort is the next phase, where one Editor does a tremendous amount of work to best complete just one article. You should be proud. Its the closest thing to article-ownership and Editor can feel, isn't it?--Revanche (talk|contribs) 12:11, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Thanks. Responses follow.
  • Meh, thought the Level 2 History header was redundant at this point, but fair enough.
  • I used the term "Dragoon Mystery" because the entire section was pretext - Kristofur is not even mentioned in it. Its simply the situation he enters in my third history section.
  • Hmmmm... fair enough.
  • Thank you. No doubt, my buddy Doneve will post the pic from Brush Wars soon. :) (I don't have a scanner.)
  • Thanks. ClanWolverine101 15:40, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Done Wink.gif--Doneve 17:08, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Theodore Kurita[edit]

CW, I re-added the template for Major Periphery States to the article, for Kurita is indeed mentioned in that title. However, if the material from that book has been added to the article already (by you or another Editor), please feel free to remove it again. Thanks. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 10:57, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Understood, and no I haven't. I dropped that banner because I've seen about 100 articles that has that up, and it doesn't add anything. I use those banners to either remind myself, or say "hey - i don't have this particular product - can someone else put it on their todo list?" But a whole bunch of pages have the MPS banner. Besides, surely Theo is just a footnote in it? ClanWolverine101 15:29, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Reference : Disambiguation article[edit]

The Battle of Luthien may refer to:

  • Battle of Luthien (3052): the invasion by Clan Smoke Jaguar and Clan Nova Cat
  • Battle of Luthien (3067-3074): the four-way campaign by the Kuritan Loyalists, the Black Dragon Society, the Word of Blake and the Clans Ghost Bear & Nova Cat.

Disambig icon.png This disambiguation page lists articles associated with the same title. If an internal link led you here, you may wish to change the link to point directly to the intended article.

This will come in handy. ClanWolverine101 16:11, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Sure will! Some people use their user pages as storage sites. Check out mine. Its a great place to quickly find things you need later. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 19:38, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
But if we used your page for storing references like this, where would we have our fun conversations and hijinks?!? :P ClanWolverine101 22:17, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Variable Speed Pulse Laser[edit]

Saw you had updated the VSPL page with note you'd add something later. No need. I just fixed the redirect to point to the Laser page. I'm going to go through and check the other laser pages now to make sure nothing was missed.--Mbear 18:57, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Task Force Vengeance[edit]

CW, take another look at Task Force Vengeance. I agree it should be a disambiguation page, since there will be two articles dealing with different formations having the name Task Force Vengeance. However, the intent of disambig pages is to point readers directly to the information on the subject of the disambig (Task Force Vengeance), rather than educate them about every aspect of the event surrounding the formation's use. as such, you find the most appropriate article and you can rename it, so that directly informs the reader where they should go to read more. For example, if I was looking for the TF formed by the surviving AMC, I can quickly identify the first link as being the article i want to read on the subject. Does that make sense? --Revanche (talk|contribs) 11:53, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

I think so? If you feel I had too much detail there, I have no problem with you changing it. I only added that detail to avoid the inevitable "Which Task Force Vengeance do you mean?" "The one during the Jihad." "Which TF Vengeance during the Jihad do you mean?" and so on. I can maybe fix it myself. ClanWolverine101 13:46, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
... nevermind, you already did so. ClanWolverine101 14:06, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

The Battle of Mars[edit]

Certainly, we MIGHT have called it "Attack on Mars" (which makes it sound like a bad '50s movie) or "Task Force Vengeance" (of which there are two). I went in this direction. I feel its one of my better efforts, but I leave it to you all to judge. Give it a read here. ClanWolverine101 04:55, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Lots of minor things. Check Policy:Manual of Style for a lot of it. The one thing that I removed was the reference to the date of Pearl Harbor; the source did not mention it (though you were supposed to pick up on it, as a reader), so there doesn't seem to be anything supporting the importance of the date. I won't try to enumerate the other changes; just check the history to see the differences. --Scaletail 00:02, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

WarShip/DropShip infobox request[edit]

Just an FYI: I put your request for updates to the DropShip and WarShip infoboxes on the Admin's page to try to get some discussion about them.--Mbear 13:31, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. Just seemed like something that could be done. ClanWolverine101 14:34, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
Didn't hear any objection to adding the Small Craft/ASF line to DropShip and WarShip infoboxes, so I just did that. It's an optional field, so if there are no values, the line will be ignored. You'll probably have to go back and add it to the infobox for most of the Ships, but I assume you knew that already.--Mbear 14:51, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
  • Nods* Shouldn't be too hard. In most cases, the info is already in the main text. Thanks. ClanWolverine101 15:36, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Speculation Notes on Victor and Hohiro[edit]

So. I added little notes under "family" for both of these characters. Hohiro, in that he was supposedly descended from Camerons, and Victor, in the whole Dragoon-trueborn thing. (Actually, Victor's thing also applies to Victor and others, but I decided not to go nuts.) If you'd like to debate those placements, please go to the respective Talk pages. Thanks! ClanWolverine101 16:13, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Dechan Fraser lives![edit]

So I finally wrote the Dechan Fraser article. Character was a favorite of mine. I know there are more "red links" then we'd like, but I'm thinking I'll soon tackle Michi, Samsanov, and maybe Jenette. Anyway, feel free to weigh in. ClanWolverine101 07:30, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

You just got yourself earmarked for a Good Article award, once it is available to be granted! This is another article that I've been meaning to write for some time, and you've done a sterling job. Thank you. Frabby 07:33, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Gracias! ClanWolverine101 07:36, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Ivan Sorenson[edit]

Ivan Sorenson is up. A minor character? Perhaps. But I always liked that scene with him and Takashi in the Grasshopper. Anyway, feel free to review it. ClanWolverine101 06:04, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

HY, please put this award on your page All Purpose Award, 2nd ribbon, for your Ivan Sorenson article, good work.Greetings--Doneve 08:56, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks! And thank you for posting his pic! ClanWolverine101 16:07, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Vandervahn Chistu[edit]

Another new page. Vandervahn Chistu was a perfect bastard. ClanWolverine101 20:34, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Notable pilots: Possible answer[edit]

Please review: BattleTechWiki_talk:Project_BattleMechs#Notable_Pilots_Sample_page. Thanks!--Mbear 14:16, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Posted response there, thanks. ClanWolverine101 14:45, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
First, thanks for the award. I appreciate it.
Second, what does this comment mean:
It might be considerably more elaborate than I would prefer and maybe defeats the purpose for not being on the page
I'm not quite clear on that.--Mbear 15:23, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
Oh - I mean I would ideally prefer the Notable Pilots section to be on the actual article page. But perhaps its not possible to do that and resolve these other issues. ClanWolverine101 15:28, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
My fault for not explaining. I would have a "Notable Pilot" section on the 'Mech page. Underneath it would be a comma separated list of well known pilots. So the Warhammer page would have something like:

Notable Pilots[edit]

Well known pilots of the Warhammer include: Yoriniga Kurita, Natasha Kerensky, Jon Doe, and Some Random Guy I Can't Remember.

The links for Yoriniga and Natasha would point to their articles, while the last two would point to the appropriate part of the List of Notable Pilots. Make sense?--Mbear 15:37, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

... that's even better! :D
(Sorry - Didn't get enough sleep last night.) ClanWolverine101 15:49, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
That's OK. I don't think I get enough sleep...well, ever really.--Mbear 16:26, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Tomoe Sakade[edit]

Tomoe Sakade is up. Always one of my favorite characters; I felt she was unfairly reduced to a footnote character after Heir to the Dragon. Feedback is welcome as always. ClanWolverine101 03:05, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Kid gloves[edit]

Hey, just wanted to share my appreciation for your recognition of my efforts to reach out to the 'noob' you so long ago. While not an endorsement of either side in the other exchange, I felt honored to be so recognized. I especially found humorous the 'eye rolling' bit. I know what you mean. Its not common to find such benchmarks of significant development once you're an adult, especially over so short a period of time. BUT....back on topic....glad you stuck around. The project is markedly stronger for your efforts. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 01:03, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

I appreciate that. For the record, I don't so much look at it as choosing sides as I do being considerate of other editors, regardless of whether or not they are an admin. I do my best to be considerate when I see something in an article that I feel merits deleting. Several times, I've posted something to the Talk page... and then had another editor go ahead and make the change. So in that respect, I can see it both ways. But new people - yeah. We should talk first, act second.
Thanks again. ClanWolverine101 01:19, 17 June 2010 (UTC)


Image Answer[edit]

Hy, take a look on Policy talk:Images.--Doneve 21:00, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Archiving[edit]

There is some mystique about archiving that is unfounded, once a person has done it once. While sub-pages are generally frowned upon for anything other than user pages, for archival purposes they're required.
So, for the Project BattleMechs talk page, you'd create a sub-page for it, usually naming it something that allows further archival pages. For example, I'd probably name this one BattleTechWiki talk:Project BattleMechs/Archive1. Notice the use of the forward slash. After you do that, copy the text you want to move and paste it onto the archive page and save. Next, copy the link for the archive page near the top of the original page, usually with a bullet. Then delete the copied text from the original page and save. You should then have the original page with a wikilink to the archive page and less material. When you click on the wikilink, you'll see all of the material you culled.
Some people keep adding to one archive page until it reaches some limit (of their own decision). On my talk page, I tend to create archive pages by year and add to the present year's whenever my own talk page gets too long.
Hope this helps. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 13:39, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

... that's far more simple than I thought it would be. Thank you. ClanWolverine101 16:12, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
Not a problem. ;-) --Revanche (talk|contribs) 16:41, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Gallery Template[edit]

So I don't lose it again...

Gallery[edit]

ClanWolverine101 03:01, 27 June 2010 (UTC)


I Need help and support[edit]

Hy, I have 4 projects and need support

  • 1st: Bring all merc commands to the standard of 3076 => which information is needed and how can i presented it
  • 2nd: Deployment Tables for each era with information updates (which unit fought or were destroyed) which way is the best
  • 3rd: how create information about tech level of each unit and their supply status
  • 4th: more informations about the unique force structure of each faction (how presented and what is needed)
let me know what are you thinking about it Neuling 19:07, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Your first project interests me the most.
Regarding the 4th : Do you mean the organization trees? ClanWolverine101 23:47, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Notable pilots stuff[edit]

Hey, I updated the Notable pilots discussion as you requested. Summary of the problem and the proposed solution. BattleTechWiki talk:Project BattleMechs#Famous Pilots - Overview and Proposed Solution.--Mbear 15:40, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

New Article : Ninyu Kerai Indrahar[edit]

Ninyu Kerai Indrahar is done. This fella is my favorite sociopathic bastard in the whole Btech universe. ClanWolverine101 07:10, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Hy again, have you any idea where i can find a Ninju Kerai image, i looked for it but i cant find it.--Doneve 21:15, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
You know, I checked every book I could find, and I couldn't find a pic anywhere either. Maybe from the CCG? ClanWolverine101 23:32, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Nicholas Kerensky pic[edit]

Hy, you don't can see the pic., it is from Historical: Operation Klondike and falls under the moratorium, user Neuling, uploaded it, removed it when it see the moratorium violation.--Doneve 20:01, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Oh, I see. should we delete it from the code? ClanWolverine101 23:49, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Star League Civil War[edit]

Hi, ClanWolverine, I saw you made a re-direct for Star League Civil war. After reading Jihad Hot Spots: Terra, i got impression that war itself the conflict was actual named Star League Civil War, due to the Hegemony people initially backing Amaris thinking he was replacing a incompentant leader. Do you think later when the moratorium on JHS:Terra is done, that main article could be changed to Star League Civil War instead of Amaris Civil War? I know name been used before, but sounds like Amaris is fighting his own people.-- Wrangler 13:26, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Hmmm. Well, for the record, I only put that in there because I found some "red links" on the Wiki to "Star League Civil War" that were in reference to it. I haven't read JHS Terra, but I'm reluctant to rename an article like that too quickly. Even though "JHS Terra" is the most recent publication, there have been references to the Kerensky/Amaris war in countless products dating back to the beginning of battletech. I would propose finding a way of determining what name is most commonly used in all that history. ClanWolverine101 14:01, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
I agree, only reason why i think change maybe coming is due to CGL's policy that new info trumps old information. If you recall, alot FASA products had some typos in dates and mistaken events which lead to problems in canon. You've been active and keen mind with handling battletech lore and history, so i want bounce this question to you before asking the rest of the Sarna editors. Anyways, I would ask the writers when i able. -- Wrangler 15:43, 20 July 2010 (UTC)


Support Please[edit]

Hey, I have a huge project on the run and need support/ideas for the best solution. The 1st Aragon Borders is a example for future work. My idea is do rework all units an bring them to one level with the same structure. I have done the same to the mercs lately. Only a few units are left, but this is only temporary. Please view it an give my a response. Any support is welcome... Neuling 18:24, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Quote of the Week[edit]

"What do I know about Dark Age? Just this : Way, way WAY too much incest." - CW

Shadow Cat II[edit]

The refs to it being a Fedcom CW design are actually in the Dossier links provided under Reference. Not sure what else you feel needs to be added to this. Istal devalis 19:16, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Ah, okay. Maybe I feel the citations should be clarified. Thank you, though. ClanWolverine101 19:40, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
The sneak peak of the TRO:3085's Table of Content has the Shadow Cat II among the units in the book. -- Wrangler 11:51, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
Splendid. That solves that, then. ClanWolverine101 03:25, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
I'm glad to be as of some help. Unfortunately for me, they retroconned M1 Marksman Tank. Which not sitting well with me. -- Wrangler 13:42, 28 July 2010 (UTC)


Long Road Campaign[edit]

Hey, I have a request to you. Please reagard my work about the DCMS and give me a short review. TnxNeuling 18:51, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Neuling - I've been looking them over. Its a lot of material you've put up, and that is impressive. But quite a bit of it needs to be gone over for copyediting and references. I've checked a few of them already, and I know Scaletail has as well. ClanWolverine101 18:53, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

Chaparral Artillery link[edit]

CW, I saw that you'd removed the artillery link from the Chaparral page with the comment that you don't think artillery needs its own page. Fair enough, but if you look at the wanted page list, you'll see that there are 20 pages linking to Artillery. Just FYI. :)--Mbear 12:58, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Fair 'nuff. Put it back if you must. ClanWolverine101 18:31, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Michi Noketsuna[edit]

Michi Noketsuna is up. More red-links, perhaps, then would be ideal, but I feel they're all relevant. Personally, I think this is my best effort thus far, but as always I welcome feedback. ClanWolverine101 04:31, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Yes Michi is still alive :). Hy ClanWolverine101 please put this award All Purpose Award, 3rd ribbon for your great work about Michi Noketsuna.Greetings--Doneve 07:57, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks! ... and where is Michi alive??? I'm so happy! :) ClanWolverine101 15:38, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

James Cobb[edit]

Hello Clan Wolverine. Can you hold off editing that page? I'm working on it. I don't need multi-editing while i'm editing. I'll remove the i'm editing thing once i'm done. Thank you. -- Wrangler 11:16, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Sure. Just leave the work in progress banner up. No worries. ClanWolverine101 22:02, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

FedCom Civil War[edit]

Holla, I undo Neulings revision of the page, i dont know whats going on.--Doneve 20:29, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

It was a technical failure. From time to time my acoount get cloased for unknown reason. During such a event I was saving the FedCom article. I don't know how could it happen but with the help of Doneve it could restore it back to the former version. Neuling 20:36, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
Glad to know its been taken care of. ClanWolverine101 03:58, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

Holla, thanks for helping out, I start my copyeding project, to bring up all units to a wiki standard, and updade the reference, biblio section, and by your minor support i present you this Casual Edit Award, 1st ribbon award ;) ;). --Doneve 05:13, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, Doneve! ClanWolverine101 07:10, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Copyediting[edit]

Thank you for your copyediting work on my short story articles. Looks like I wasn't as done with them as I thought. :)

I appreciate your efforts, and I think another Casual Edit Award (2nd ribbon) is in order. Keep up the good work! Frabby 08:41, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Frabby - Don't mention it. As I see it, no article is ever truly finished. There is always more to add, and there are always screws to tighten up. Thanks! ClanWolverine101 18:55, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

New Article : J. Elliot Jamison[edit]

J. Elliot Jamison is up for review. Also, if Doneve would be kind enough to add Jamison's pic from the WD Sourcebook, that would be fantastic. :) ClanWolverine101 06:37, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

DoNe Clan Wolverine 101 ;).--Doneve 14:18, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
Thanks!!! ClanWolverine101 14:47, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Isoroku Kurita[edit]

Isoroku Kurita is up. I just love Robert Charette's minor characters. :P ClanWolverine101 04:15, 1 January 2011 (UTC)