User talk:Fireangel


Welcome, Fireangel, to BattleTechWiki!

We look forward to your contributions and want to help you get off to a good strong start. Hopefully you will soon join the army of BattleTech Editors! If you need help formatting the pages, visit the manual of style. For general questions go to the Help section or the FAQ. If you can't find your answer there, please ask an Admin.

Additional tips
Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the wiki:

  • For policies and guidelines, see The Five Pillars of BattleTechWiki and the BTW Policies. Another good place to check out is our market of Projects, to see how the smaller communities within BTW do things in their particular niche areas.
  • Each and every page (articles, policies, projects, images, etc.) has its very own discussion/talk page, found on the tab line at the top of the page. This is a great place to find out what the community is discussing along that subject and what previous issues have already been solved.
  • If you want to play around with your new wiki skills, the Sandbox is for you. Don't worry: you won't break anything. A great resource for printing out is the Wiki Cheat Sheet.
  • Also consider writing something about yourself on your UserPage (marked as "Fireangel" at the top of the page, though only do this if you're registered). You'll go from being a 'redshirt' to a 'blueshirt,' with the respect of a more permanent member.
    • This is really helpful for the admins as we will know you're a human rather than a spambot and we won't block and delete you accidentally.
  • If you're not registered, then please consider doing so. At the very least, you'll have a UserPage that you own, rather than sharing one with the community.
  • Introduce yourself at the new user log.
  • In your Preferences, under the edit tab, consider checking Add pages I create to my watchlist and Add pages I edit to my watchlist, so that you can see how your efforts have affected the community. Check back on following visits by clicking on my watchlist.
  • If you're bored and want to find something to do, try the Random button in the sidebar, or check out the List of Wanted Pages. Or even go to Special Pages to see what weird stuff is actually tracked by this wiki.
  • Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name (or IP address, if you are editing anonymously) and the date.

Again, welcome to Sarna's BattleTechWiki!

*******Be Bold*******

List of named ships[edit]

I appreciate the work you put into the list of known ships in the Feng Huang article. But ever since opting for full articles on individual ships we've been using the categories instead of listing individual ships in the article about a ship class. This is far easier to maintain as the categories will auto-update whenever a new individual ship article pops up.

That's why I changed your edit back to a category link. Just wanted to tell you why. :) Frabby (talk) 15:13, 21 January 2016 (PST)

Thanks for letting me know! But it occurs to me... what about ships of that class that don't yet have articles? --Fireangel (talk) 14:31, 12 February 2016 (PST)
You should write them! :) ClanWolverine101 (talk) 22:16, 12 February 2016 (PST)
How can I write them, if I don't know the article is missing? A ship named in canon should be mentioned in the article itself without relying to the ship class category; if the hypothetical Aegis-class SLS Cumbersome (mentioned in the hypothetical novel Warrior: Reatreat!) does not have an article in Sarna, and does not get mentioned in the Aegis article, how would anyone know that the article is missing unless they already knew of the existence of the ship?
I posit that each ship class article should have a list of known ships of the class, rather than rely on the category page, in order to avoid this very issue. Why would the article itself not have a list of known ships of the class?
--Fireangel (talk) 06:51, 7 March 2016 (PST)
Hmm. I do see your point Fireangel. But ultimately, what you're proposing is adding redlinks to an article so that others will feel compelled to create those redlink articles. If you do that, what's keeping you from creating the article in question yourself instead of a redlink? We've got help templates in place that (hopefully) make it very easy to add a new ship article, with all the relevant category links in place (see Help:CreateWarShipClassArticle or more generally, BattleTechWiki:Spacecraft Portal).
I also have to say that I'm opposed to the idea of putting individual ships into the ship class article on as a matter of principle. That's exactly what categories are for, and I've taken care to provide a link to the category with individual ships of each class within each article about a given ship class. Frabby (talk) 04:34, 8 March 2016 (PST)
Not a redlink: the name of the ship can be in plain (black) text, listed among the links to other named ship articles. If the individual ship article gets made, then the link is completed in the ship class article. As to not creating the article in question, the reader might not be aware of the existence of the missing ship. The ship class article would be incomplete without the inclusion of these ship names if there is no article for them.
Look at it this way: If Ford created a car in 1953 called the "Ford Unheardof", it would be listed among the models of Ford cars of that year, whether it is by year, by type, by obscurity, or a comprehensive list on the Ford article or as a separate article. Whether the actual article for the Ford Unheardof exists or not, the model would have to be listed in order to be a complete article. If the Unheardof is not listed, then the article would be missing information, and unless the reader is aware of the existence of the Unheardof, the reader would be completely unaware that such a model ever existed.
I understand your objection to in-article lists, but it is not a viable policy; in this case, by using category pages in lieu of actual lists, the list becomes a list of articles, not a list of individual ships. The question that needs to be asked then is, what is the article about? Does it document the things in the fictional universe, or does it document only the articles in Sarna?
Categories exist to ease searching and navigation; they are not meant to be articles in and of themselves.
--Fireangel (talk) 09:13, 24 March 2016 (PDT)