User talk:Mbear/archive2015

Other FM 3085/3145 Units[edit]

Hi Mbear, I'm still going work on the industrial Mech profiles. I noticed your working on 3085/3145 regiments. I just wanted ask if there were other 3085/3145 regimental units you wanted me to tackle? their fast and easy in comparison to the mech unit ones sometimes. -- Wrangler (talk) 13:21, 6 January 2015 (PST)

Well, if you feel like it, the Marik Protectors as a whole could use some attention. Those are the only ones I can think of off the top of my head.--Mbear(talk) 04:27, 7 January 2015 (PST)
I've just done the Harvester Ant now, there questions left open about how the Inner Sphere got mods original introduced by the Pentagon Powers since they were completely separated and like wiped out. No way they would shared their methods of hot wiring combat systems into a industrial ArgoMech. I'll work on Marik Protectors stuff today -- Wrangler (talk)
I think the Pentagon Power versions of the 'Mechs were just where their record sheets were introduced to the players. There are rules for using Pentagon style refits in Historical: Reunification War, pp 204-205.--Mbear(talk) 05:07, 7 January 2015 (PST)
I'll try do boiler plate write up to cover all the effected units. Problem is the MUL has them introduced 2801. I'm tempted to ask about this is errant or now. -- Wrangler (talk) 08:09, 7 January 2015 (PST)

Problem with 5th Capellan Chargers[edit]

Hi Mbear, someone merged the old Cochraine's Goliaths with the Dark Age version of the 5th Capellan Chargers. There nothing in fluff of the 5th Chargers suggesting there anything related. Goliaths are related since they were once part of the original, were storied component and became their own unit. I found nothing suggesting their part of it. I'd like official input to seperate the articles from one another. I'm uncertain if the Editor who did this is currently around. -- Wrangler (talk) 13:27, 16 January 2015 (PST)

Template for Support Vehicles needs to be update[edit]

Hi Mbear, i not sure how active you are, but i was wondering if you knew who would be able to update the Help:CreateSupportVehicleArticle template. It's dated badly, I'm not editor so if you or one of the other folks can fix this thing, it would be great! Also, if you could try model it from one more recent Support Vehicle articles, such as for the Anastaska Maro. That would help alot from me having change alot things in it. Thank you! -- Wrangler (talk) 11:45, 17 March 2015 (PDT)

Article Updates[edit]

Hi MBear,
I just noticed that despite you making thousands of edits to articles as you try and purge the "update needed" list, you've never earned a Casual Edit Award. That just doesn't seem right, so please have one on me:
Casual Edit Award, First ribbon
BrokenMnemonic (talk) 23:38, 28 April 2015 (PDT)

Thanks!--Mbear(talk) 04:44, 29 April 2015 (PDT)


Mbear - Page 342 from the reprinted edition. Theodore struck their name from the rolls because they had been part of the attack on Dragoon civilians. ClanWolverine101 (talk) 06:29, 8 May 2015 (PDT)

XTRO: Republic I Request[edit]

Hey Mbear , With Republic opening up soon, i want to request to-do couple vehicles articles in XTRO: Republic I. I really don't want race and compete with you or others to try put article in, do you mind me calling dibs on Castrum Pocket WarShip and Strix Stealth VTOL? -- Wrangler (talk) 11:06, 9 May 2015 (PDT) BrokenMnemonic


Thank you very much for swooping in and clearing out that list! Have an award for your help: Random Act of Appreciation Award, 4th ribbon -BobTheZombie (talk) 17:44, 24 June 2015 (PDT)

Thanks! I think there might be one or two I missed though.--Mbear(talk) 05:15, 29 June 2015 (PDT)

Overton (Scout)[edit]

Just to explain why I deleted that redirect right after you fixed it from a double redirect: It was superflous, as not only it didn't conform to our new ship naming scheme, but also no single article linked to that name. It was also somewhat ambiguous, as there's at least two ship classes called "Scout", Scout (JumpShip class) and Scout (DropShip class).
There's bound to be a couple more such cases. Frabby (talk) 05:52, 8 September 2015 (PDT)