User talk:RuinsFate

So, I figure since I read this wiki semi regularly, and I get tempted to fix some of the grammar and spelling errors I see, might as well make an account for it rather than mess around authenticating myself each time.

I am also IP: (talk) 21:26, 27 September 2013 (PDT)

Excellent. Glad to have you on the editorial board. Saw your edits to Catapult II. Looks like some of the uncorrected statements amused you. I assure you, we have plenty more of those types of 'easter eggs' throughout the site for you to find.--Revanche (talk|contribs) 21:58, 27 September 2013 (PDT)
Feel free to point me at any specific one with grammar issues I can clean up if you see one that desperately needs itRuinsFate (talk) 02:01, 28 September 2013 (PDT)
I hate to say it, but if you hit the Random Page link in the side bar five times, the odds are good you'll find several candidates within the results. Without going into privacy issues, we have several very productive editors here that do a great job in populating the site with needed material, but their writing skills are lacking (and they know it). If your 'thang' is copy-editing, you'll find yourself to be appreciated here. Again, thanks for contributing! --Revanche (talk|contribs) 06:55, 28 September 2013 (PDT)
If it interests you, you should definitely go through the unreviewed character pages; those are fraught with grammatical errors (mostly they're the wrong tense). Also, welcome to Sarna, and I hope you stay! -BobTheZombie (talk)
Welcome aboard! Seems like everybody has their own favorite method of finding articles in need of help. Check out for article that are tagged as in need of cleanup. --Scaletail (talk) 16:39, 28 September 2013 (PDT)
[sheepish] Scaletail is right. These are the ones most needing your attention.--Revanche (talk|contribs) 17:02, 28 September 2013 (PDT)

Reset Indent: Well, on a whim I pulled Plasma Cannon out of that list Scaletail linked and had a go at it, what do you think?RuinsFate (talk) 17:18, 28 September 2013 (PDT)

Welcome again, when you cleand up pages, can you add ref. notes from canon sources when its needed, this where very help full for double check etc., thanks.--Doneve (talk) 17:26, 28 September 2013 (PDT)
That would help, wouldn't it. Sorry, I'll get to that when I can get back to my books.-RuinsFate (talk) 17:28, 28 September 2013 (PDT)
Very good clean-up. And thanks for removing the tag, too.
No need to apologize about not using cites. We highly encourage their use, but they aren't required. What they do do is add to the project's legitimacy. When you do start adding cites, feel free to seek me out for guidance (format and coding). It can get confusing, at first. (After long absences, I often have to find examples to remind me.) --Revanche (talk|contribs) 05:32, 29 September 2013 (PDT)

Templar III Related Mechs[edit]

Hi RuinsFate, thanks for cleaning up Templar III article of my grammer mistakes. I sometimes don't realize i do that unfortunately. I wanted tell you i restored a link you removed from the Pendragon notation, where i had a link for both Experimental Technology / Advanced Technology. I had links to both these subjects because the 'Mech was re-rated by 3090 as a advanced technology machine rules wise. I know the double links don't look good, but i purposely put them there for sake of accuracy. -- Wrangler (talk) 09:37, 29 September 2013 (PDT)

No problem. I'll keep an eye out for that in future and try not to remove such cases.-RuinsFate (talk) 17:32, 29 September 2013 (PDT)