Category talk:Places

Hy, i think places hit not really the category name, the most articles there put in are city articles, and we change the category name to "City's and Places or City's or or...", every idea is welcome.--Doneve 15:44, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Given that all of these articles seem to be stubs, and that it is unlikely at best that any further information will be published, I have to ask why bother creating individual articles for these places? They should be listed in a single article concerning the planet they are on. Further, the articles lack any notion as to their context in the timeline. You can't just say the Takaoguchi area has less than a million inhabitants without mentioning the year for which this information is correct (it may have been five millions in 2750). Frabby 13:09, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

I believe articles should be merged, with parent planet and list it under a heading of Known cities. If there more to the city, then it should be listed under it. Agree with Frabby, they should be listed in there own individual articles, not even as temporary one. -- Wrangler 17:08, 28 May 2010 (UTC)