Difference between revisions of "Talk:Armor (BattleMechs & Combat Vehicles)"

m
(Undo revision 409908 by Doneve (talk))
Line 10: Line 10:
 
::Category Page.  or having a "same name" (my latin sucks) page.  Having the Generic data for armor in general on the Standard Armor Page doesn't fit how Ferro-Fibrous & Ferro Aluminium have the fluffed out desctription for the armor.--[[User:PerkinsC|Cameron]] 16:08, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 
::Category Page.  or having a "same name" (my latin sucks) page.  Having the Generic data for armor in general on the Standard Armor Page doesn't fit how Ferro-Fibrous & Ferro Aluminium have the fluffed out desctription for the armor.--[[User:PerkinsC|Cameron]] 16:08, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 
:::Information really shouldn't go in the category page. If you feel that a page devoted to the general concept of "armor" is in need, I'm all for it. My only suggestion about your above proposed text is this: when I write articles for weapons and equipment, I make clear distinctions between background information and game stats. I would split up what it actually is from the in-game "tech level". --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 01:38, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 
:::Information really shouldn't go in the category page. If you feel that a page devoted to the general concept of "armor" is in need, I'm all for it. My only suggestion about your above proposed text is this: when I write articles for weapons and equipment, I make clear distinctions between background information and game stats. I would split up what it actually is from the in-game "tech level". --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 01:38, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 
==Placeholder==
 
*Clan Armor
 
: 17-J Standard <ref> TRO 3060 p. 166 </ref>
 
: Alpha Compound Plate <ref> TRO 3060 p. 174 </ref>
 
: CerPlate Mod 2F <ref> TRO 3060 p. 154 </ref>
 
: Compound 2110 <ref> TRO 3060 p. 38 </ref>
 
: Compound Alpha Standard <ref> TRO 3060 p. 138 </ref>
 
: Compound G5 <ref> TRO 3060 p. 52 </ref>
 
: Compound JX2 <ref> TRO 3060 p. 34 </ref>
 
: Forged Type HH32 with CASE <ref> TRO 3060 p. 180 </ref>
 
: Forging C629/j <ref> TRO 3060 p. 150 </ref>
 
: Forging OTR17b (Standard) <ref> TRO 3060 p. 172 </ref>
 
: Forging OTR17b with CASE <ref> TRO 3060 p. 136 </ref>
 
: Forging SA722 with CASE <ref> TRO 3060 p. 168 </ref>
 
: Forging ZK11 Standard <ref> TRO 3060 p. 144 </ref>
 
: Forging ZZ7 Ceramic Plate <ref> TRO 3060 p. 182 </ref>
 
: Mix IIIc Composite <ref> TRO 3060 p. 156 </ref>
 
: Royal-7 Standard <ref> TRO 3060 p. 148 </ref>
 

Revision as of 09:54, 18 August 2017

Mech.gif This article is within the scope of the Project Technology, a collaborative effort to improve BattleTechWiki's coverage of Technology. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Mech.gif



This article has been flagged for review by the Technology WikiProject team. If you have reviewed this article, please remove the tr parameter from this template.


Fluff Text

As Written, the majority of the fluff text appears to better fit what should be on the main page for Armor in general vice what is being used on the main page for Standard BattleTech Armor. All in Favor of moving Fluff? All Opposed?--Cameron 19:08, 4 December 2009 (UTC)


Also suggest adding in fluff text that fits what is known of this technology. "Composed of Ferrus materiels for effectiveness against Ballistic, Explosive/Missile & Physical/Mele attacks laced with diamond fibres and backed with ceramics to defeat Laser and / or energy based attacks, this type of Armor is used by both the InnerSphere and the Clans and has a Technology Rating of D due to its being developed in the Age of War. First introduced on BattleMechs, it was rapidly fitted on the Combat Vehicles that followed in responce to the vast superiority of the BattleMech over the vehicles of the time (closer to Category:Support Vehicles than Category:Combat Vehicles).--Cameron 19:08, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

What main page for armor? When did that happen? --Scaletail 00:08, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Category Page. or having a "same name" (my latin sucks) page. Having the Generic data for armor in general on the Standard Armor Page doesn't fit how Ferro-Fibrous & Ferro Aluminium have the fluffed out desctription for the armor.--Cameron 16:08, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
Information really shouldn't go in the category page. If you feel that a page devoted to the general concept of "armor" is in need, I'm all for it. My only suggestion about your above proposed text is this: when I write articles for weapons and equipment, I make clear distinctions between background information and game stats. I would split up what it actually is from the in-game "tech level". --Scaletail 01:38, 9 December 2009 (UTC)