Talk:Roughneck

Revision as of 20:10, 8 December 2016 by R0sshk (talk | contribs) (→‎Discussion: Askes question about canonocity)

In short

Roughneck: https://mwomercs.com/roughneck

Non-canon Heavy Mech created by PGI for the MechWarrior Online.


Discussion

Thanks for writing article for this mech, Cyc :) --ManganMan (talk) 15:09, 3 December 2016 (PST)

Loader King?

I am not familiar with the Loader King am I right in thinking that they have actually added two 'Mechs to the BTu in one fell swoop?--Dmon (talk) 18:29, 3 December 2016 (PST)

Correct. Technical Readout: Vehicle Annex mentions Achernar make multiple IndustrialMechs and the naming format matches the Dig King, but cannot locate it being specifically mentioned before.Cyc (talk) 19:03, 3 December 2016 (PST)

Model Designation

Might want to keep an eye on the model prefix. While the lore article uses the "RGK" prefix, the sale page and FAQ both use the "RGH" designation.

Also built them in Skunkwerks, and the 1A's cost comes to 5,209,573 c-bills. 68.51.25.163 19:35, 3 December 2016 (PST)

MechWarrior Online Picture

Is there a specific rules here on Sarna to use MwO graphics? Or it's just a placeholder?--ManganMan (talk) 02:44, 4 December 2016 (PST)

Non-Canon?

I was under the impression that the Roughneck was specifically canon. With a blessing from Catalyst and even a potential appearance in the upcoming Battletech strategy game. Though admittedly, I can't seem the exact point where this was declared. Apparently at some point during MechCon 2017? --R0sshk (talk) 16:09, 8 December 2016 (PST)