Talk:Terra

Revision as of 16:47, 9 February 2012 by Doneve (talk | contribs)
This article is within the scope of the Planets WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve BattleTechWiki's coverage of planets. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

Two Planets in One System

Howdy, I think this needs to be broken up little bit plus the Era specific information need to be seperated from Planetary Data. I think Mars should get its own Planet article, since Niops V, VII and VIII have individual listings and it makes for less clustered article. Also, there maybe call to reorganize Terra related info since there staggering amount information. -- Wrangler 22:02, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

You mean Mars? Or the moons of Saturn that have bases? ClanWolverine101 06:09, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
I think Wrangler mean's the Mars.--Doneve 07:09, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
Niops V, VII and VIII are seperate stars not planets, so your argument is invalid.— The preceding unsigned comment was posted by 24.79.78.16 (talkcontribs) on 28 October 2010.


Population

71.195.10.41 changed the population figures for each stated year to exactly 12 billion today. Here's where not having citations causes doubts in readers (myself, in this case). The original data had three unique population counts, one for each stated year, but was also not cited. However, in the absence of supporting evidence (by editor 71.195.10.41 or anyone else), I feel the original data is more likely and I'll revert it, unless properly cited in short order.--Revanche (talk|contribs) 20:23, 8 February 2012 (PST)

Turns out the section was properly cited, as I found the 3130 population figure. I directly cited it and changed it to the proper amount. Other changes still need to be properly cited or face reversion.--Revanche (talk|contribs) 20:32, 8 February 2012 (PST)
At first I corrected the 3076 population and adding a ref.note, and i undo user 71.195.10.41 revision, he changed all back what Revanche and I fixed on the page.--Doneve 12:47, 9 February 2012 (PST)