Talk:Urizen II

This article is within the scope of the Spacecraft WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve BattleTechWiki's coverage of DropShips, JumpShips and Warships. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

This article has been flagged for review by the Project: Spacecraft team. If you have reviewed this article, please remove the tr parameter from this template.

Question...[edit]

Don't we normally just list individual ships on the Warship article? ClanWolverine101 21:31, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

No we don't actually, only if there extensive history and background fluff. Like the Invisible Truth or the Voidswimmer. Usually history is mentioned in briefs in Article on the class itself. - Wrangler 00:44, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
I'm starting a long project. This represents the first section of the first stage. Yes, individual ships are currently listed within the WarShip article. To my mind, this is like the notable warriors on BattleMech pages in the sense that there is a list with a synopsis and a link for further reading. Obviously, the reading isn't much further right now, but it will be. --Scaletail 03:00, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
Alrighty, Scaletail, so you going to do all the ships? from what i've gleamed from various source books, there isn't alot on majority of them. Such as Urizen II. I look forward to fruits of your labor. If like me or other folks help out, let us know. -- Wrangler 04:01, 8 August 2010 (UTC)


Test of Vengeance[edit]

I'm reading this Classic novel now and it includes an even at the Courchevel system in August 3063 where a group of Ghost Bears on their way back to Predlitz manage to use their Elementals to take control of a Kirishima-class Cruiser later revealed to be the Urizen II. Not sure how this event factors into its history as I have yet to read the Jihad books. But the ship was returned at the end of the book, but should a mention be added here? Geekyguide (talk) 08:57, 7 July 2020 (EDT)

Yes it should be mentioned here. --Dmon (talk) 11:08, 7 July 2020 (EDT)