Difference between revisions of "User talk:Cease to Hope"
Sarna News
(→All Purpose Award: new section) |
(InfoBoxIndMech) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I appreciate the numerous edits you've made to learn the template system and then upgrade those 30+ 'Mech articles with the missing fields. For this, I award you the Editors' All Purpose Award. [[File:AP.jpg|All Purpose Award, 1st ribbon]] (I'd put it in an awards board for you, but since you directed your user page to here, I don't want to mess up your intent.) Again, thanks.--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 08:01, 4 September 2017 (EDT) | I appreciate the numerous edits you've made to learn the template system and then upgrade those 30+ 'Mech articles with the missing fields. For this, I award you the Editors' All Purpose Award. [[File:AP.jpg|All Purpose Award, 1st ribbon]] (I'd put it in an awards board for you, but since you directed your user page to here, I don't want to mess up your intent.) Again, thanks.--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 08:01, 4 September 2017 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==InfoBoxIndMech== | ||
| + | Hiya, | ||
| + | |||
| + | why did you redirect the IndustrialMech infobox to the BattleMech infobox? I'm not sure if I agree though not totally opposed either. BattleMechs and IndustrialMechs are treated as distinct unit types by the construction rules, and the infoboxes, while similar, aren't identical (c.f. BAR). And if we're really lumping things together, shouldn't it then be the InfoBoxMech? [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] ([[User talk:Frabby|talk]]) 04:40, 13 September 2017 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 04:40, 13 September 2017
All Purpose Award
I appreciate the numerous edits you've made to learn the template system and then upgrade those 30+ 'Mech articles with the missing fields. For this, I award you the Editors' All Purpose Award. 
(I'd put it in an awards board for you, but since you directed your user page to here, I don't want to mess up your intent.) Again, thanks.--Revanche (talk|contribs) 08:01, 4 September 2017 (EDT)
InfoBoxIndMech
Hiya,
why did you redirect the IndustrialMech infobox to the BattleMech infobox? I'm not sure if I agree though not totally opposed either. BattleMechs and IndustrialMechs are treated as distinct unit types by the construction rules, and the infoboxes, while similar, aren't identical (c.f. BAR). And if we're really lumping things together, shouldn't it then be the InfoBoxMech? Frabby (talk) 04:40, 13 September 2017 (EDT)