SAMs or the lack of...

Pages: 1
Karagin
02/22/02 12:30 PM
63.173.170.184

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
A few months ago, during a game, my aerospace fighter was taken out by a SAM, which was nothing more then an Arrow IV uses as a SAM.

Now do you folks think this a good idea or should something like the Thunderblot missiles be used?
Karagin

Given time and plenty of paper, a philosopher can prove anything.
CrayModerator
02/22/02 01:29 PM
204.245.128.3

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
Thunderbolts, LRMs, SRMs, ATMs, ELRMs (if you use'em), and their variations.

The missiles of BT are wonderfully flexible in what they can blow up - very flexible guidance systems. The same missiles make good SAMs, AAMs, AGMs, ATGMs, etc.
Mike Miller, Materials Engineer

Disclaimer: Anything stated in this post is unofficial and non-canon unless directly quoted from a published book. Random internet musings of a BattleTech writer are not canon.
Karagin
12/08/06 02:53 PM
70.123.166.36

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
Okay for the new folks or hey I really want to talk about this again.
Karagin

Given time and plenty of paper, a philosopher can prove anything.
Pages: 1
Extra information
0 registered and 63 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Nic Jansma, Cray, Frabby, BobTheZombie 

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Topic views: 4246


Contact Admins Sarna.net