Fusion ignition achieved in lab at LLNL/NIF

Pages: 1
Pht
08/14/22 05:10 PM
173.187.210.254

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
https://scitechdaily.com/nuclear-fusion-...megajoule-shot/

Quote:
Nuclear Fusion Energy Breakthrough: Ignition Confirmed in Record 1.3 Megajoule Shot
TOPICS:EnergyFusionFusion EnergyFusion ReactorLawrence Livermore National Laboratory

By Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory August 14, 2022
Cryogenic Target Fusion Ignition

On the one-year anniversary of achieving a yield of more than 1.3 megajoules at LLNL’s National Ignition Facility, the scientific results of this record experiment have been published in three peer-reviewed papers: one in Physical Review Letters and two in Physical Review E. This stylized image shows a cryogenic target used for these record-setting inertial fusion experiments. Credit:James Wickboldt/LLNL

After decades of inertial confinement fusion research, a yield of more than 1.3 megajoules (MJ) was achieved for the first time on August 8, 2021. This put scientists at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory’s (LLNL’s) National Ignition Facility (NIF) at the threshold of fusion gain and achieved scientific ignition.

On the one-year anniversary of this historic achievement, the scientific results of this record experiment have been published in three peer-reviewed papers. One paper was published in Physical Review Letters and two in Physical Review E. In the Physical Review Letters paper, more than 1,000 authors were included to recognize and acknowledge the many individuals who have worked over many decades to enable this significant advance.

“The record shot was a major scientific advance in fusion research, which establishes that fusion ignition in the lab is possible at NIF,” said Omar Hurricane, chief scientist for LLNL’s inertial confinement fusion program. “Achieving the conditions needed for ignition has been a long-standing goal for all inertial confinement fusion research and opens access to a new experimental regime where alpha-particle self-heating outstrips all the cooling mechanisms in the fusion plasma.”

The results from August 8, 2021, are described in detail in the papers. They also include the associated design, improvements, and experimental measurements. LLNL physicist Alex Zylstra, lead experimentalist and first author of the experimental Physical Review E paper, noted that in 2020 and early 2021 the Lab conducted experiments in the “burning plasma” regime for the first time. These set the stage for the record shot.

“From that design, we made several improvements to get to the August 8, 2021, shot,” he said. “Improvements to the physics design and quality of target all helped lead to the success of the August shot, which is discussed in the Physical Review E papers.”

This experiment incorporated a few important changes, including an improved target design. “Reducing the coasting-time with more efficient hohlraums compared to prior experiments was key in moving between the burning plasma and ignition regimes,” said LLNL physicist Annie Kritcher, lead designer and first author of the design Physical Review E paper. “The other main changes were improved capsule quality and a smaller fuel fill tube.”

Since the experiment last August, the researchers have been executing a series of experiments to attempt to repeat the performance and to understand the experimental sensitivities in this new regime.

“Many variables can impact each experiment,” Kritcher said. “The 192 laser beams do not perform exactly the same from shot to shot, the quality of targets varies and the ice layer grows at differing roughness on each target. These experiments provided an opportunity to test and understand the inherent variability in this new, sensitive experimental regime.”

Although the repeat attempts have not reached the same level of fusion yield as the August 2021 experiment, all of them demonstrated capsule gain greater than unity. They have had yields in the 430-700 kJ range, which are significantly higher than the previous highest yield of 170 kJ from February 2021. The data gained from these and other experiments are providing crucial clues as to what went right and what changes are needed in order to not only repeat that experiment but also exceed its performance in the future. The scientists are also utilizing the experimental data to increase understanding of the fundamental processes of fusion ignition and burn. They’re also working to enhance simulation tools in support of stockpile stewardship.

Looking ahead, the research team is working to leverage the accumulated experimental data and simulations to move toward a more robust regime – further beyond the ignition cliff – where general trends found in this new experimental regime can be better separated from variability in targets and laser performance.

Efforts to increase fusion performance and robustness are underway via improvements to the laser and improvements to the targets. Additionally, they’re working on modifications to the design that further improve energy delivery to the hotspot while maintaining or even increasing the hot-spot pressure. This includes improving the compression of the fusion fuel, increasing the amount of fuel, and other avenues.

“It is extremely exciting to have an ‘existence proof’ of ignition in the lab,” Hurricane said. “We’re operating in a regime that no researchers have accessed since the end of nuclear testing, and it’s an incredible opportunity to expand our knowledge as we continue to make progress.”

References:

“Lawson Criterion for Ignition Exceeded in an Inertial Fusion Experiment” by H. Abu-Shawareb et al. (Indirect Drive ICF Collaboration), 8 August 2022, Physical Review Letters.
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.075001

“Experimental achievement and signatures of ignition at the National Ignition Facility” by A. B. Zylstra et al., 8 August 2022, Physical Review E.
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.106.025202

“Design of an inertial fusion experiment exceeding the Lawson criterion for ignition” by A. L. Kritcher et al., 8 August 2022, Physical Review E.
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.106.025201



Myomers ... fusion ignition ... they'll never manage the armor though. :P
Karagin
08/14/22 10:57 PM
70.118.172.64

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
Given time, money, and a need, they will figure out better armor...
Karagin

Given time and plenty of paper, a philosopher can prove anything.
Pht
08/15/22 06:29 PM
98.20.185.65

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
Given the ballpark of what the BT weapons theoretically dish out (yeah, I'm pretty sure we don't have a solid grasp, so I'm just guessing) I don't see us making armor that effective.

Any armor less than an inch thick that can stop a gauss slug moving at supersonic speeds that weighs even just a few KG ... and what has to be possibly multi-megawatt lasers AND explosive warheads?

BT armor is made out of fairy dust and evil.
ghostrider
08/15/22 09:01 PM
45.51.181.83

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
The description of Battletech armor was stated in the first books put out, had a diamond filament that ran thru it, making it far more durable and able to resist melting in high temperatures.
Whether or not it actually works is questionable.
And so you know, logic and Battletech do not normally work together.
But it is a science fiction game, so some logic has to be overlooked in order for it to work. Just wish they would not try to use logic to stop some things, but use it to promote others.
Karagin
08/15/22 11:33 PM
70.118.172.64

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
I agree we won't get the same armor the game has, we will get whatever the R&D nerds come up with, but we will have stuff that is better than current and when you end up mixing all things together, we might see something akind to mechs one day.
Karagin

Given time and plenty of paper, a philosopher can prove anything.
ghostrider
10/03/22 10:07 PM
45.51.181.83

Edit Reply Quote Quick Reply
Would be nice to have these reactors up and running, so power costs come down.
The question becomes, when will the owners of the energy industry will try and either shut it down, or buy them out, so no one can work on alternative power sources, so they can protect their profits and (no pun intended) power base.
The oil companies did this with the old fuel systems to avoid V-8s from getting 30+ miles to the gallon in city.

It also means upgrading the un-maintained power lines that the electric companies have left to rot to make more profits.
It also has the side effect of making electric cars more likely to be pushed, as power becomes reliable and cheaper, removing a large chunk of the pollution factor.

I believe most power charging stations not monitored with real security will have issues with vandals and worse, copper thieves trying to steal the wires.
One great side effect of electric cars is the lack of noisy exhaust systems people like to put on vehicles. No more 4 am people racing their engines to warm it up to go to work.
Pages: 1
Extra information
0 registered and 33 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Nic Jansma, Cray, Frabby, BobTheZombie 

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is disabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Topic views: 4745


Contact Admins Sarna.net