Help talk:CreateWarShipClassArticle
Sarna News
- HEXTECH Review - Wave 3 Brings More Urban Options To Your Battlefield
- Your BattleTech News Round-Up For March, 2024
- Crashing 'Mechs With Jennifer Brozek, Author Of The Rogue Academy Trilogy
- Getting The Word Out With Rem Alternis, Catalyst Community & Marketing Director
- Bad 'Mechs - Yeoman
- Read more →
Question about WarShip info box[edit]
If an existing Warship Class article has more fields than the Info Box in the WarshipClass template, should we remove the additional fields?
For example, the Aegis class article Info Box has a field for "AeroSpace Fighters/Small Craft". Should this field be removed from the Aegis class Info Box, so that the Aegis info box looks like the other Warship Class info boxes?
75.23.228.139 19:27, 8 August 2022 (EDT)
- Yes, non-standard infoboxes is something I am trying to slay. So many editors copy/paste another article to help them start new articles that over time the simple one off can become a form of low-key disruptive editing (looking at all the Clan characters people removed the family sections from a few years ago). Eventually all the infoboxes will be upgraded so empty sections simply do not show.--Dmon (talk) 19:33, 8 August 2022 (EDT)
- Acknowledged, I'll remove the part about Aerospace Fighters/Small Craft from the Aegis info box (which also helps with the aerospace fighter capitalization project, yay) 75.23.228.139 19:39, 8 August 2022 (EDT)
- Morning, 75.23.228.139: there has been a mis-understanding of your question.
- Because we don't like empty fields to display in articles' infoboxes, (where identified and possible) we allow the empty fields to "hide". As not all WarShips carry small craft & aerospace fighters, those that don't have the field empty and hidden. That doesn't apply to Aegis (WarShip class), because it does carry 10 & 18 elements respectively.
- As for the site-wide "aerospace fighter" corrections, I've changed the copy & paste code for the template to reflect the changes and it will now show infoboxes with the corrected terms.
- Thank you for bringing this to our attention.--Revanche (talk|contribs) 08:04, 9 August 2022 (EDT)