Talk:Aesir (Combat Vehicle)
Sarna News
- Bad ‘Mechs - Sentinel
- HEXTECH Review - Wave 3 Brings More Urban Options To Your Battlefield
- Your BattleTech News Round-Up For March, 2024
- Crashing 'Mechs With Jennifer Brozek, Author Of The Rogue Academy Trilogy
- Getting The Word Out With Rem Alternis, Catalyst Community & Marketing Director
- Read more →
Engine rating[edit]
I made some small grammar and style tweaks; however, I'm not sure I follow the sentence "Using game designers, such as Heavy Metal Vee, when the vehicle has given wheels, its given a lower setting engine as 145 rate fusion engine." --Museling 02:06, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- Ask Wrangler what he meant. He usually understands that some of his entries need cleaning up. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 03:00, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- I suspect Wrangler's talking about the fact that there's a disconnect between the art and stats. It's obviously a wheeled design from the artwork but its stats are written up on the dossier as if it were tracked. If it was a properly Wheeled vehicle, it'd have a 145 rated engine instead of the listed 165 rated engine. --Istal devalis 15:39, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, both of you; that makes sense. I rewrote the text appropriately. --Museling 21:57, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry to chirp in so late. That is correct, there is a discrepancy between the stats of the dossiers and what Heavy Metal Vee dictates what kind of engine rating vehicle (and vehicle type) should have based on rules its programmed. Sometimes I have trouble formulating correct grammer passages when I'm typing them out. Sorry for the confusion. -- Wrangler 22:31, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, no worries. If I was thinking, I would have gotten it the first time. I hope I've described it accurately - if not, do whatever needs doing. And thanks. --Museling 23:50, 16 March 2010 (UTC)