Talk:Light fusion engine

Inconsistencies

I noticed the "Used By" column is inconsistent as to if the "IS" should be listed before the mech/vehicle name, or after. Could someone please clarify? BobTheZombie (talk) 07:41, 18 June 2013 (PDT)

Also, some of the mech names are in all caps, while others are just capitalized; what should they all be? And should I put links to all the mechs/vehicles in the list? BobTheZombie (talk) 07:47, 18 June 2013 (PDT)

See what you mean. The all-caps vehicle names are clearly wrong in the sense that the preferred style here would be to write them normally (capitalized), and put 'Mechs and aerospace fighters in italics, too. Also, yes, they should be links.

As for the IS part, if the table is to be kept then I reckon IS: or Clans: (or even Periphery:) should be put in front of the respective vehicle. I'm not sure if this entire table belongs into this article in the first place though. Frabby (talk) 09:17, 18 June 2013 (PDT)

How's that? BobTheZombie (talk) 15:12, 18 June 2013 (PDT)

How should the "model" column be organized? Should they be laid out like: Leenex 145 Light Fusion or 260 Magna lite light Fusion or Defiance 275 Light Fusion Engine? -BobTheZombie (talk) 12:35, 18 August 2013 (PDT)

Hy Bob, i know the page must revamp, take a look on the Communications System page as example, i stard with revamp in the past, its under work but a lot is to do.--Doneve (talk) 12:51, 18 August 2013 (PDT)

I am going to revamp this som time soon I think.--Dmon (talk) 20:46, 4 September 2018 (EDT)

Ha, beat you to it... Fixed the MilSpec references as well. I've settled on how models are listed elsewhere, specifically "Model" "Rating" "Modifier". If anyone's confused by what I mean, have a look at the Magna (Engines) for the breakdowns between ICE, standard, XL, XXL, et al. I'm pretty happy with the formatting currently but have added stub tag since the list needs going over for content now. R0AHN (talk) 00:08, 14 July 2023 (EDT)