Template:Controversial
The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
Contents
Usage[edit]
No description.
Parameter | Description | Type | Status | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Small | small | no description | Unknown | optional |
Category | category | no description | Unknown | optional |
This template will categorise articles into Category:Controversial topics. To use this template, add {{Controversial|date=March 2025}}
to an article’s talk page.
See also[edit]
Policy/Guideline pages[edit]
- BattleTechWiki:Accuracy dispute
- BattleTechWiki:Consensus
- BattleTechWiki:Dispute resolution
- BattleTechWiki:Disputed statement
- BattleTechWiki:Neutral point of view
- BattleTechWiki:Template messages
- BattleTechWiki:Template namespace
Templates[edit]
Disputed factual accuracy[edit]
- Boxes:
- {{Disputed}} For disputing entire article
- {{Disputed section}} For disputing a section in an article
- {{Disputed tag}} For disputing recent promotions or amendments of policies and guidelines
- {{Under discussion}} For use on project pages (e.g., policies and guidelines), not on articles
- Inline:
- {{Dubious}}, and {{Disputed inline}} Statement
- {{Under discussion inline}} Statements on project pages
Both accuracy and POV[edit]
- Boxes:
- {{Controversial}} Talk page
Disputed neutrality (POV)[edit]
- Boxes:
- {{POV}} Article,
- {{POV section}} Section
- Inline:
- {{POV statement}} Statement