Template:Undue weight inline
Sarna News
[undue weight? – discuss]
Template documentation
Usage[edit]
{{undue inline|{{subst:DATE}}}}{{undue inline|reason=your justification|{{subst:DATE}}}}{{undue inline|1=Talk section|reason=your justification|{{subst:DATE}}}}
Add this template after a fact to signify that this statement may be giving undue weight to an idea or point of view. The template may also be used to identify a fringe idea. To specify a section of the discussion on the talk page, use {{undue-inline|talk page section name}}.
Parameters[edit]
- 1 – section name of the Talk page discussion to link to (optional; no default)
- reason – your justification for placing the template (optional; no default)
TemplateData[edit]
This template adds an inline cleanup tag, questioning if a source has been given undue weight.
| Parameter | Description | Type | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Month and year | 1 date | The month and year of when the tag was added.
| String | suggested |
| Reason | reason | An optional explanation for why the tag has been added. | String | suggested |
See also[edit]
Policy/Guideline pages[edit]
- BattleTechWiki:Accuracy dispute
- BattleTechWiki:Consensus
- BattleTechWiki:Dispute resolution
- BattleTechWiki:Disputed statement
- BattleTechWiki:Neutral point of view
- BattleTechWiki:Template messages
- BattleTechWiki:Template namespace
Templates[edit]
Disputed factual accuracy[edit]
- Boxes:
- {{Disputed}} For disputing entire article
- {{Disputed section}} For disputing a section in an article
- {{Disputed tag}} For disputing recent promotions or amendments of policies and guidelines
- {{Under discussion}} For use on project pages (e.g., policies and guidelines), not on articles
- Inline:
- {{Dubious}}, and {{Disputed inline}} Statement
- {{Under discussion inline}} Statements on project pages
Both accuracy and POV[edit]
- Boxes:
- {{Controversial}} Talk page
Disputed neutrality (POV)[edit]
- Boxes:
- {{POV}} Article,
- {{POV section}} Section
- Inline:
- {{POV statement}} Statement
