BattleTechWiki:Requests for comment/Archive
Sarna News
The Request for Comment forum allows Editors to introduce an issue that may have sprung up either in a high-traffic area (ex: Project:BattleMech) or somewhere more obscure (ex:2418), but may require a third, fourth or even twenty-third opinion. This allows a community consensus to be formed through discussion and may affect more than just the article being discussed.
Useage: Introduce a new entry with an asterisk (*), right below the dividing line and above the previous entry. Start it off with a link to the discussion page of the article in question, and a very brief summary of the issue being discussed. Remember to sign the entry (with four tildes: ~~~~). Please do not add an opinion to the summary here.
Acceptable Example:
- Policy Talk:Notability: discussion as to what shall be done with articles deemed non-notable. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 12:55, 19 December 2007 (CST)
Unacceptable Example:
- Policy Talk:Notability: Some spammer wants to create an article about himself, just because he wrote some fan-boy story about Peder Smythe. Let's 'explain' to him why that won't fly. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 12:55, 19 December 2007 (CST)
Requests for Comments:
Add comments here (above the previous entry)
- Policy:Verifiability: asking for a consensus review by BTW editors for this policy candidate. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 00:57, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
- Template talk:NonCanon: Surprised it has not yet been done (or I have not been able to find it) - we need to clear up what is canon and what is not (and all the ambiguous grey areas in-between). Frabby 02:41, 11 May 2008 (CDT)
- Category talk:Planets: Question about treatment of "lost" or "unknown" worlds and ambiguous canon Frabby 09:09, 20 January 2008 (CST)
- Talk:Concord of Kapteyn: Proposal for a new category covering laws, treaties, etc. --Scaletail 20:20, 19 January 2008 (CST)
- Talk:Elemental: Regarding the status of the cleanup tag on the article. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 07:31, 20 December 2007 (CST)