Difference between revisions of "BattleTechWiki talk:2011 Founder's Awards"
Sarna News
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Ambassador?== | ==Ambassador?== | ||
How come there is no nomination for Ambassador of the Year this time 'round? [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] 08:11, 22 January 2012 (PST) | How come there is no nomination for Ambassador of the Year this time 'round? [[User:Frabby|Frabby]] 08:11, 22 January 2012 (PST) | ||
| − | :Because you always walk away with it. | + | :Because you always walk away with it. {{Emoticon| ;) }} |
:Real reason: I thought there was some prior years discussion that the award was unnecessary and/or over-emphasized (compared to other BTW efforts). I have no problem including it, especially if you're fine with it.--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 09:34, 22 January 2012 (PST) | :Real reason: I thought there was some prior years discussion that the award was unnecessary and/or over-emphasized (compared to other BTW efforts). I have no problem including it, especially if you're fine with it.--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 09:34, 22 January 2012 (PST) | ||
Revision as of 13:35, 22 January 2012
Ambassador?
How come there is no nomination for Ambassador of the Year this time 'round? Frabby 08:11, 22 January 2012 (PST)
- Because you always walk away with it.
- Real reason: I thought there was some prior years discussion that the award was unnecessary and/or over-emphasized (compared to other BTW efforts). I have no problem including it, especially if you're fine with it.--Revanche (talk|contribs) 09:34, 22 January 2012 (PST)
