Difference between revisions of "Category:Meta-Sources"
Sarna News
- HEXTECH Review - Wave 3 Brings More Urban Options To Your Battlefield
- Your BattleTech News Round-Up For March, 2024
- Crashing 'Mechs With Jennifer Brozek, Author Of The Rogue Academy Trilogy
- Getting The Word Out With Rem Alternis, Catalyst Community & Marketing Director
- Bad 'Mechs - Yeoman
- Read more →
(Created page with 'For the purpose of this BattleTechWiki, the '''Meta-Source''' moniker is applied to any published work (either in digital form or in print) that is not itself an official, li…') |
m (BTW is itself a meta-source.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | For the purpose of this [[BattleTechWiki]], the '''Meta-Source''' moniker is applied to any published work (either in digital form or in print) that is not itself an official, licensed [[BattleTech]] publication, but which nevertheless contains only information taken from [[canon]]ical sources, with little or no original, non-canonical content ([[Fanon]]). | + | For the purpose of this [[BattleTechWiki]], the '''Meta-Source''' moniker is applied to any published work (either in digital form or in print) that is not itself an official, licensed [[BattleTech]] publication, but which nevertheless contains only information taken from [[canon]]ical sources, with little or no original, non-canonical content ([[Fanon]]). It this regard, BTW is itself a Meta-Source. |
Meta-Sources are invariably unofficial products and thus non-canon, even if produced by somebody who is an acknowledged author of canonical content otherwise. | Meta-Sources are invariably unofficial products and thus non-canon, even if produced by somebody who is an acknowledged author of canonical content otherwise. | ||
This means that Meta-Sources are themselves unsuitable as a reference for BTW articles; instead, references should be made to whatever source the Meta-Source drew upon. | This means that Meta-Sources are themselves unsuitable as a reference for BTW articles; instead, references should be made to whatever source the Meta-Source drew upon. | ||
Revision as of 11:37, 7 February 2010
For the purpose of this BattleTechWiki, the Meta-Source moniker is applied to any published work (either in digital form or in print) that is not itself an official, licensed BattleTech publication, but which nevertheless contains only information taken from canonical sources, with little or no original, non-canonical content (Fanon). It this regard, BTW is itself a Meta-Source.
Meta-Sources are invariably unofficial products and thus non-canon, even if produced by somebody who is an acknowledged author of canonical content otherwise.
This means that Meta-Sources are themselves unsuitable as a reference for BTW articles; instead, references should be made to whatever source the Meta-Source drew upon.
Pages in category "Meta-Sources"
The following 9 pages are in this category, out of 9 total.
Pages in category "Meta-Sources"
The following 9 pages are in this category, out of 9 total.