Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Sources needing updates"
Sarna News
(→Two Different Categories: new section) |
(→Two Different Categories: try again) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
The one thing that bothers me about seeing this header on an article is that I'm never certain if the Moratorium period has passed. Does anyone else think a revision is in order? [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 05:45, 1 April 2010 (UTC) | The one thing that bothers me about seeing this header on an article is that I'm never certain if the Moratorium period has passed. Does anyone else think a revision is in order? [[User:ClanWolverine101|ClanWolverine101]] 05:45, 1 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Methinks you haven't looked at the tag most recently. ;)--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 23:47, 1 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 19:47, 1 April 2010
Parent category[edit]
There is also a missing attribution category. Should a parent category be created for both groups? --Ebakunin 12:13, 29 June 2009 (PDT)
- I would think so. It would make those of us prone to 'fixing' things a clear place to go. But, then again, maybe we really should be putting these categories directly on the ToDo list. I'll hit the latter, if you'd like to the former. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 12:25, 29 June 2009 (PDT)
Two Different Categories[edit]
The one thing that bothers me about seeing this header on an article is that I'm never certain if the Moratorium period has passed. Does anyone else think a revision is in order? ClanWolverine101 05:45, 1 April 2010 (UTC)