Category talk:Structural Materials

Revision as of 11:11, 1 April 2021 by Pserratv (talk | contribs) (→‎Title)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Title[edit]

The title of this category does not strike me as entierly accurate. Structural Materials made me think of much more base materials like Endo-Steel or the fact that 'Mech chassis use Titanium. Now I have had a look at the category, I do think the category itself is useful, but maybe rename it as something like Vehicle Components or something similar. I feel components is the correct term to use but I am undecided on what would be the best descriptive.--Dmon (talk) 07:55, 1 April 2021 (EDT)

I would go on only Components, as they can be also used for BattleMechs or Aerospace fighters.--Pserratv (talk) 07:58, 1 April 2021 (EDT)
Actually, if we remove Myomers we could go with Structural Components and have the engines, myomers, actuators etc as Motive Components if you still want to keep the spirit of this category in tact. This however call up the question of if we need to break them up in such a manner, but it is at least less generic than Components--Dmon (talk) 08:59, 1 April 2021 (EDT)
For me Structural Components is ok as Myomers are an structure. I like the name. By the way, I picked this category because it was not classified and linked it. It is an old one, not sure what behind that.--Pserratv (talk) 11:11, 1 April 2021 (EDT)