Difference between revisions of "Category talk:User Essays"

m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Once we have a few more entries here I may end up putting them into a tabular form rather than plain text entries. -- [[User:LRichardson|LRichardson]] 18:40, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
 
Once we have a few more entries here I may end up putting them into a tabular form rather than plain text entries. -- [[User:LRichardson|LRichardson]] 18:40, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
 
:If we're gonna bastardize the use of the category function, I really think we need to add in alphabetical sections (and one for numerals) now, so that it doesn't get cluttered and hard to grasp.--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 18:50, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
 
:If we're gonna bastardize the use of the category function, I really think we need to add in alphabetical sections (and one for numerals) now, so that it doesn't get cluttered and hard to grasp.--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 18:50, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
 +
::Good idea. I will do so. -- [[User:LRichardson|LRichardson]] 18:59, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:59, 11 July 2011

Once we have a few more entries here I may end up putting them into a tabular form rather than plain text entries. -- LRichardson 18:40, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

If we're gonna bastardize the use of the category function, I really think we need to add in alphabetical sections (and one for numerals) now, so that it doesn't get cluttered and hard to grasp.--Revanche (talk|contribs) 18:50, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
Good idea. I will do so. -- LRichardson 18:59, 11 July 2011 (UTC)