Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Word of Blake Commands"
Sarna News
- Bad ‘Mechs - Sentinel
- HEXTECH Review - Wave 3 Brings More Urban Options To Your Battlefield
- Your BattleTech News Round-Up For March, 2024
- Crashing 'Mechs With Jennifer Brozek, Author Of The Rogue Academy Trilogy
- Getting The Word Out With Rem Alternis, Catalyst Community & Marketing Director
- Read more →
(resp) |
(Question/Suggestion) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:::I was thinking that people seeking information will be looking for but a bunch of redirects could sort it out in necessary. I am fine with the actual removal of "Word of Blake" from the article titles. --[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] 12:33, 5 August 2009 (UTC) | :::I was thinking that people seeking information will be looking for but a bunch of redirects could sort it out in necessary. I am fine with the actual removal of "Word of Blake" from the article titles. --[[User:Dmon|Dmon]] 12:33, 5 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::You're right: re-directs go a long way to solving anything, and Ebakunin's installation of the search suggestion has been very helpful to me. Its just that the ending article (after all the re-directs) needs to match a style easily comprehensible to others, and in synch with the way all the other articles are handled.--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 13:35, 5 August 2009 (UTC) | :::You're right: re-directs go a long way to solving anything, and Ebakunin's installation of the search suggestion has been very helpful to me. Its just that the ending article (after all the re-directs) needs to match a style easily comprehensible to others, and in synch with the way all the other articles are handled.--[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 13:35, 5 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::Would it be better simplier to rename the remaining article to Xth Division (Word of Blake) or X Shadow Division (Word of Blake) to unify the documents. It looks sloppy way its listed in this category. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 19:09, 27 August 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:09, 27 August 2009
Can we remove "Word of Blake" from the Shadow Division article titles? I understand the need with the standard WoB divisions, but there are no other Shadow Divisions. --Scaletail 00:04, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
- I would of thought it was better to keep the full title. --Dmon 00:34, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
- Dmon, I'd be a little more hesitant to remove the faction name if it were a part of their canon name. However, my recollection is that the Shadow Divisions only have preceding numbers (ex: "48th Shadow Division"). We use "(Word of Blake)" to follow non-unique names (where more than one faction might use the same designation, like "3rd Air Wing (Alliance Military Corps)".--Revanche (talk|contribs) 03:23, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
- Scaletail, I'm fine with removing the faction from a faction-unique name (like Shadow divisions). But I believe we need to have it in a following capacity for more common names. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 03:23, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
- I was thinking that people seeking information will be looking for but a bunch of redirects could sort it out in necessary. I am fine with the actual removal of "Word of Blake" from the article titles. --Dmon 12:33, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
- You're right: re-directs go a long way to solving anything, and Ebakunin's installation of the search suggestion has been very helpful to me. Its just that the ending article (after all the re-directs) needs to match a style easily comprehensible to others, and in synch with the way all the other articles are handled.--Revanche (talk|contribs) 13:35, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
- Would it be better simplier to rename the remaining article to Xth Division (Word of Blake) or X Shadow Division (Word of Blake) to unify the documents. It looks sloppy way its listed in this category. -- Wrangler 19:09, 27 August 2009 (UTC)