Difference between revisions of "Policy:Canon"
(→Articles on Licensed Sources: some expansion) |
|||
| (31 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{Policy}} |
| − | {{nutshell| | + | {{nutshell|<br />1. BTW allows all things BattleTech onto its pages.<br />2. BTW does not seek to decide which official products contribute canon.<br />3. Material from fan-made or otherwise unofficial sources must be segregated from official material.<br />4. BTW does not publish fan fiction.}} |
| − | The BattleTechWiki | + | ==The Canon Policy== |
| + | The [[BattleTechWiki]] (BTW) approach to the issue of [[Canon]] for the [[BattleTech]] universe is as follows: | ||
| + | ;BTW allows all things BattleTech into its pages | ||
| + | :BTW aims to be an all-inclusive source of BattleTech-related information. Therefore, as established in the BTW [[Policy:Notability]], anything that has to do with BattleTech warrants inclusion, irrespective of whether or not it is canonical or even official. Non-canonical subjects, such as fanzines, parodies or real-world treatises of the BattleTech universe, are explicitly included among the material that BTW seeks to cover. | ||
| − | + | ;BTW does not seek to decide which official products contribute canon | |
| + | :The [[Line Developer]]'s official ruling on the issue of what is Canon and what is not, i.e. the stance of the owners of the intellectual property that is BattleTech, is detailed in the article '''[[Canon]]'''. BTW deliberately leaves it to the individual user to interpret that ruling and decide what information he deems canonical for his personal vision of the BattleTech universe. The policy adopted by BTW is not to decide on the canonicity of a given source or piece of information, and apply appropriate tags to highlight articles where Canonicity could be considered problematic. | ||
| − | + | ::''See also [[Canon#Conflicting_information|Canon]] in regards to the hierarchy of canonicity of conflicting sources.'' | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | ;Material from fan-made or otherwise unofficial sources must be segregated from official material | |
| − | + | :BTW articles are considered to discuss official issues of the BattleTech universe by default. Articles pertaining to unofficial topics or subjects (such as Fanon/fan fiction) must therefore be tagged accordingly. In this context, even the work of a person who is a BattleTech author otherwise is considered Fanon if it was not produced in an official capacity. | |
| + | :[[Meta-source]]s, i.e. unofficial compilations of information from other, canonical sources, are not regarded as canonical themselves and are not valid as references for articles on official subjects. In any case where they have been cited, the statements themselves may be challenged with the '''<nowiki>{{citation needed}}</nowiki>''' template and the meta-source citation removed. | ||
| + | ;BTW does not publish fan fiction | ||
| + | :Owing to BTW's origin as a fansite, we used to permit fan-fiction (Fanon) on this site. This has been changed by [[Policy talk:Fanon|user consensus]], with the approval of the site owner. As a result, fan fiction may not be posted on this site anymore and existing fan fiction content has been transferred over to the [http://www.battletechfanon.wikia.com/ BattleTech Fanon Wiki]. | ||
| + | :As per ruling #1 above, articles ''about'' individual pieces of Fanon/fan fiction are still permissible, if the subject in question has been published elsewhere and is notable enough. | ||
| + | :See [[Policy:Fanon]] for details. | ||
| − | + | Articles covering real-world subjects, such as authors or companies, naturally stand outside of the canon of the fictional universe and are not affected by the Canon Policy. | |
| − | |||
| + | We appreciate your adherence to this core policy and welcome you to actively join the community of users and editors of BattleTechWiki. | ||
| − | == | + | ==How to implement the policy== |
| − | + | Contributors to BTW are encouraged to familiarize themselves with the official stance as outlined in [[Canon]]. Since it is the canon that defines the BattleTech universe, BTW articles are meant to represent canonical information by default. It is therefore not required to explicitly mark (clearly) canonical products or information as such. | |
| − | + | Articles dealing with apocrypha, non-canon and fanon are the exception, and must contain a "Canonicity" section where information on their canonicity status is presented. Further, they must be tagged accordingly by inserting the appropriate tag from among the following to the top of the article: | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | ===Articles about non-canonical subjects=== | |
| + | :Tag: '''''<nowiki>{{NotCanon}}</nowiki> | ||
| + | If the subject of the article does neither (clearly) fall under either Canon or Apocrypha, or if it is not an official (licensed) BattleTech product (i.e. Fanon/fan fiction), then the [[Template:NotCanon]] tag should be included. This will insert the following box into the article: | ||
| + | {{NotCanon}} | ||
| − | '' | + | ===Articles about apocryphal products=== |
| + | :Tag: '''''<nowiki>{{ApocryphalProduct}}</nowiki> | ||
| + | If the subject of the article does not (clearly) fall under Canon, but is an official product that contains original additional information pertaining to the BattleTech universe, then the [[Template:ApocryphalProduct]] tag should be included. This will insert the following box into the article: | ||
| + | {{ApocryphalProduct}} | ||
| − | ==Articles | + | ===Articles containing exclusively apocryphal information=== |
| − | '' | + | :Tag: '''''<nowiki>{{ApocryphalArticle}}</nowiki> |
| + | If the subject and content of the article are exclusively based on a source that is itself apocryphal, then the [[Template:ApocryphalArticle]] tag should be included. This will insert the following box into the article: | ||
| + | {{ApocryphalArticle}} | ||
| − | + | ===Articles containing both canonical and apocryphal information=== | |
| − | + | :Tags: '''''<nowiki>{{ApocryphalContentStart}}</nowiki>''''' and '''''<nowiki>{{ApocryphalContentEnd}}</nowiki> | |
| − | + | If content from an apocryphal source is added to an article about an otherwise canonical subject, then these templates ([[Template:ApocryphalContentStart]] & [[Template:ApocryphalContentEnd]]) should be used to mark those parts of the article that are based on apocryphal sources. Note that unlike the other tags, these should not be put at the top of the article. This will insert the following boxes into the article: | |
| − | + | {{ApocryphalContentStart}} | |
| − | + | (Apocryphal Content goes here.) | |
| − | + | {{ApocryphalContentEnd}} | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Revision as of 18:03, 1 August 2022
 |
 | This page in a nutshell: 1. BTW allows all things BattleTech onto its pages. 2. BTW does not seek to decide which official products contribute canon. 3. Material from fan-made or otherwise unofficial sources must be segregated from official material. 4. BTW does not publish fan fiction. |
Contents
The Canon Policy
The BattleTechWiki (BTW) approach to the issue of Canon for the BattleTech universe is as follows:
- BTW allows all things BattleTech into its pages
- BTW aims to be an all-inclusive source of BattleTech-related information. Therefore, as established in the BTW Policy:Notability, anything that has to do with BattleTech warrants inclusion, irrespective of whether or not it is canonical or even official. Non-canonical subjects, such as fanzines, parodies or real-world treatises of the BattleTech universe, are explicitly included among the material that BTW seeks to cover.
- BTW does not seek to decide which official products contribute canon
- The Line Developer's official ruling on the issue of what is Canon and what is not, i.e. the stance of the owners of the intellectual property that is BattleTech, is detailed in the article Canon. BTW deliberately leaves it to the individual user to interpret that ruling and decide what information he deems canonical for his personal vision of the BattleTech universe. The policy adopted by BTW is not to decide on the canonicity of a given source or piece of information, and apply appropriate tags to highlight articles where Canonicity could be considered problematic.
- See also Canon in regards to the hierarchy of canonicity of conflicting sources.
- Material from fan-made or otherwise unofficial sources must be segregated from official material
- BTW articles are considered to discuss official issues of the BattleTech universe by default. Articles pertaining to unofficial topics or subjects (such as Fanon/fan fiction) must therefore be tagged accordingly. In this context, even the work of a person who is a BattleTech author otherwise is considered Fanon if it was not produced in an official capacity.
- Meta-sources, i.e. unofficial compilations of information from other, canonical sources, are not regarded as canonical themselves and are not valid as references for articles on official subjects. In any case where they have been cited, the statements themselves may be challenged with the {{citation needed}} template and the meta-source citation removed.
- BTW does not publish fan fiction
- Owing to BTW's origin as a fansite, we used to permit fan-fiction (Fanon) on this site. This has been changed by user consensus, with the approval of the site owner. As a result, fan fiction may not be posted on this site anymore and existing fan fiction content has been transferred over to the BattleTech Fanon Wiki.
- As per ruling #1 above, articles about individual pieces of Fanon/fan fiction are still permissible, if the subject in question has been published elsewhere and is notable enough.
- See Policy:Fanon for details.
Articles covering real-world subjects, such as authors or companies, naturally stand outside of the canon of the fictional universe and are not affected by the Canon Policy.
We appreciate your adherence to this core policy and welcome you to actively join the community of users and editors of BattleTechWiki.
How to implement the policy
Contributors to BTW are encouraged to familiarize themselves with the official stance as outlined in Canon. Since it is the canon that defines the BattleTech universe, BTW articles are meant to represent canonical information by default. It is therefore not required to explicitly mark (clearly) canonical products or information as such.
Articles dealing with apocrypha, non-canon and fanon are the exception, and must contain a "Canonicity" section where information on their canonicity status is presented. Further, they must be tagged accordingly by inserting the appropriate tag from among the following to the top of the article:
Articles about non-canonical subjects
- Tag: {{NotCanon}}
If the subject of the article does neither (clearly) fall under either Canon or Apocrypha, or if it is not an official (licensed) BattleTech product (i.e. Fanon/fan fiction), then the Template:NotCanon tag should be included. This will insert the following box into the article:
 | Not Canon The subject of this article does not contribute canonical content to the BattleTech universe, either because it is not intended to or because it is not an official product. |
Articles about apocryphal products
- Tag: {{ApocryphalProduct}}
If the subject of the article does not (clearly) fall under Canon, but is an official product that contains original additional information pertaining to the BattleTech universe, then the Template:ApocryphalProduct tag should be included. This will insert the following box into the article:
 | Apocryphal Product Although the subject of this article is an official BattleTech product, it does not meet the current criteria for Canon. Its content may or may not be canonical for the BattleTech universe, and for the purpose of the Sarna.net BattleTechWiki is considered apocryphal. |
Articles containing exclusively apocryphal information
- Tag: {{ApocryphalArticle}}
If the subject and content of the article are exclusively based on a source that is itself apocryphal, then the Template:ApocryphalArticle tag should be included. This will insert the following box into the article:
 | Apocryphal This article's subject is only mentioned in apocryphal sources, i.e. official BattleTech products which are not clearly Non-canon but do not meet the current Canon criteria either. For more information, check the Canonicity section. |
Articles containing both canonical and apocryphal information
- Tags: {{ApocryphalContentStart}} and {{ApocryphalContentEnd}}
If content from an apocryphal source is added to an article about an otherwise canonical subject, then these templates (Template:ApocryphalContentStart & Template:ApocryphalContentEnd) should be used to mark those parts of the article that are based on apocryphal sources. Note that unlike the other tags, these should not be put at the top of the article. This will insert the following boxes into the article:
(Apocryphal Content goes here.)