Difference between revisions of "Policy Talk:Three-revert rule"
Sarna News
- Bad ‘Mechs - Sentinel
- HEXTECH Review - Wave 3 Brings More Urban Options To Your Battlefield
- Your BattleTech News Round-Up For March, 2024
- Crashing 'Mechs With Jennifer Brozek, Author Of The Rogue Academy Trilogy
- Getting The Word Out With Rem Alternis, Catalyst Community & Marketing Director
- Read more →
(Status?) |
(resp) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | ==Status== | ||
"This policy is still under construction. | "This policy is still under construction. | ||
Until it is completed, it has not become official. Feel free to take part in the development discussion." | Until it is completed, it has not become official. Feel free to take part in the development discussion." | ||
Really? It hasn't been worked on for some time. Was it rejected, or is it falsely flagged under construction? --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 09:13, 19 March 2010 (UTC) | Really? It hasn't been worked on for some time. Was it rejected, or is it falsely flagged under construction? --[[User:Neufeld|Neufeld]] 09:13, 19 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :LOL. Well, I work on the policies as I have the time and inclination. Right now, [[:Template:Chatterweb|we have]] three other policy and two structure changes being discussed. And, I'm proud to say, I can't recall when the 3-revert rule was ever an issue here. However, because of your interest in the matter, I'll place it higher on the priority list. Its always good to have things done. Thanks for asking. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 11:44, 19 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 07:44, 19 March 2010
Status[edit]
"This policy is still under construction. Until it is completed, it has not become official. Feel free to take part in the development discussion."
Really? It hasn't been worked on for some time. Was it rejected, or is it falsely flagged under construction? --Neufeld 09:13, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
- LOL. Well, I work on the policies as I have the time and inclination. Right now, we have three other policy and two structure changes being discussed. And, I'm proud to say, I can't recall when the 3-revert rule was ever an issue here. However, because of your interest in the matter, I'll place it higher on the priority list. Its always good to have things done. Thanks for asking. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 11:44, 19 March 2010 (UTC)