Difference between revisions of "Talk:Banshee (BattleMech)"
Sarna News
- Crashing 'Mechs With Jennifer Brozek, Author Of The Rogue Academy Trilogy
- Getting The Word Out With Rem Alternis, Catalyst Community & Marketing Director
- Bad 'Mechs - Yeoman
- Your BattleTech News Round-Up For February, 2024
- Keeping BattleTech Consistent - An Interview Eric Salzman, Fact-Check Director At CGL
- Read more →
m (Mattiator moved page Talk:Banshee to Talk:Banshee (BattleMech): Making way for Banshee disambig page, to use with Banshee (AeroSpace Fighter)) |
BobTheZombie (talk | contribs) m (??????) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Due to the description of the Banshee's production years reading "...producing five thousand Banshees in a decade before its poor combat performance finally forced them to stop production", I have set the production ceased date for the Banshee in 2455. Feel free to revert if this is contradicted by canon or my conjecture is incorrect. [[User:Mattiator|Mattiator]] ([[User talk:Mattiator|talk]]) 17:24, 23 April 2013 (PDT) | Due to the description of the Banshee's production years reading "...producing five thousand Banshees in a decade before its poor combat performance finally forced them to stop production", I have set the production ceased date for the Banshee in 2455. Feel free to revert if this is contradicted by canon or my conjecture is incorrect. [[User:Mattiator|Mattiator]] ([[User talk:Mattiator|talk]]) 17:24, 23 April 2013 (PDT) | ||
:Production of the ''Banshee'' was also restarted with the advent of the -3S variant. That makes the "cease production" date a bit more complicated. --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] ([[User talk:Scaletail|talk]]) 18:24, 23 April 2013 (PDT) | :Production of the ''Banshee'' was also restarted with the advent of the -3S variant. That makes the "cease production" date a bit more complicated. --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] ([[User talk:Scaletail|talk]]) 18:24, 23 April 2013 (PDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==Production Date Confusion== | ||
+ | So can anyone explain to me why we don't use the original variant in the infobox (and thus on the year pages, etc.); for this one it was first produced in 2445 but the variant in the infobox was 2475, and it is unnecessarily confusing. I just don't understand why the oldest one isn't used. -[[User:BobTheZombie|BobTheZombie]] ([[User talk:BobTheZombie|talk]]) 15:54, 31 July 2014 (PDT) |
Revision as of 18:54, 31 July 2014
This article is within the scope of the Project BattleMechs, a collaborative effort to improve BattleTechWiki's coverage of BattleMechs. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
Due to the description of the Banshee's production years reading "...producing five thousand Banshees in a decade before its poor combat performance finally forced them to stop production", I have set the production ceased date for the Banshee in 2455. Feel free to revert if this is contradicted by canon or my conjecture is incorrect. Mattiator (talk) 17:24, 23 April 2013 (PDT)
- Production of the Banshee was also restarted with the advent of the -3S variant. That makes the "cease production" date a bit more complicated. --Scaletail (talk) 18:24, 23 April 2013 (PDT)
Production Date Confusion
So can anyone explain to me why we don't use the original variant in the infobox (and thus on the year pages, etc.); for this one it was first produced in 2445 but the variant in the infobox was 2475, and it is unnecessarily confusing. I just don't understand why the oldest one isn't used. -BobTheZombie (talk) 15:54, 31 July 2014 (PDT)