Difference between revisions of "Talk:BattleTech: 25 Years of Art & Fiction"
Sarna News
- Bad ‘Mechs - Sentinel
- HEXTECH Review - Wave 3 Brings More Urban Options To Your Battlefield
- Your BattleTech News Round-Up For March, 2024
- Crashing 'Mechs With Jennifer Brozek, Author Of The Rogue Academy Trilogy
- Getting The Word Out With Rem Alternis, Catalyst Community & Marketing Director
- Read more →
(→Title: ty) |
(Need advice on correcting discrepancy, please.) |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::Thanks, Ebakunin. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 19:43, 18 July 2009 (UTC) | ::Thanks, Ebakunin. --[[User:Revanche|Revanche]] <sup>([[User_talk:Revanche|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Revanche|contribs]])</sup> 19:43, 18 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Description and "From the back cover" == | ||
+ | I noticed today that the "From the back cover" quote is not what is written on the back cover of the actual product. It is a more detailed description of the product that is used on the [http://bg.battletech.com/?wpsc-product=battletech-25-years-of-art-fiction product page]. Why the two are different I do not know. I wish to correct this but I am not sure what would be the proper way. Quoting the proper text from the back cover to the appropriate section seems logical. But the description on the product page is very detailed and I feel it could be copied directly to the "description" section. Is this allowed? Should I use the quote template? Or would the description be best if it was reworded as is normally done?--[[User:Cache|Cache]] ([[User talk:Cache|talk]]) 12:05, 29 July 2016 (PDT) |
Latest revision as of 15:05, 29 July 2016
Title[edit]
The book appears to use the word 'BattleTech' as the primary title, with '25 Years of Art & Fiction' as a subtitle. Alternately, it may be the full title is BattleTech: 25 Years of Art & Fiction. I propose changing the article title to be 'BattleTech: 25 Years of Art & Fiction'.--Revanche (talk|contribs) 18:49, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
Description and "From the back cover"[edit]
I noticed today that the "From the back cover" quote is not what is written on the back cover of the actual product. It is a more detailed description of the product that is used on the product page. Why the two are different I do not know. I wish to correct this but I am not sure what would be the proper way. Quoting the proper text from the back cover to the appropriate section seems logical. But the description on the product page is very detailed and I feel it could be copied directly to the "description" section. Is this allowed? Should I use the quote template? Or would the description be best if it was reworded as is normally done?--Cache (talk) 12:05, 29 July 2016 (PDT)