Talk:Bolla Stealth Tank

Revision as of 20:17, 10 August 2010 by Scaletail (talk | contribs) (→‎Republic Armed Forces revision: by first appearance)
This article is within the scope of the Ground Units WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve BattleTechWiki's coverage of non-BattleMech ground units. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

Republic Armed Forces revision

Howdy, everyone. Reading the upcoming TRO:3085. The WoB version of the Bolla seems to differ from slightly re-designed Republic of Sphere version. Still OmniVehicle, but its not quite same. Using differient configurations. Which could lead to confusion. I wrote up the original article from Jihad Hot Spots: 3072. I was wondering if the Tank article should be split between (RAF Version) and the (WoB Version) so things don't get confusing. -- Wrangler 13:50, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

I would make the republic version a variant of the WOB version.--Mbear 17:16, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Only thing doing it that way, is that Republic variant actually new base unit and the WoB version now becoming rare as of the 3085. Thus why i'm not sure if WoB should be featured version. I think what going happen have two vehicle info boxes. Base unit for Bolla is differient structurelly, and configurations are differient as well. -- Wrangler 18:59, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
There are numerous 'Mechs vehicles with upgraded and massively changed variants which are covered just fine without two info boxes or splitting off into separate pages. Definitely something to raise, but at present I'd treat it like the ad-hoc method used for the Arctic Wolf or Battle Cobra. Cyc 20:29, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
Hy guys, i jump in, i am not the fan of two infoboxes in one article, when separate the articles. Greetings --Doneve 20:57, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
In general, the first version has been treated as the "main" version and gets the InfoBox. For example, this applies to the 'Mechs that were new in 3050, but then got 3039 versions. If there is enough information to make the RAF version the main, InfoBox version, I think that's the way to go. --Scaletail 00:17, 11 August 2010 (UTC)