Difference between revisions of "Talk:Commando"
Sarna News
- Bad ‘Mechs - Sentinel
- HEXTECH Review - Wave 3 Brings More Urban Options To Your Battlefield
- Your BattleTech News Round-Up For March, 2024
- Crashing 'Mechs With Jennifer Brozek, Author Of The Rogue Academy Trilogy
- Getting The Word Out With Rem Alternis, Catalyst Community & Marketing Director
- Read more →
(base variant is reason for category) |
m |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
This mech is listed as a 0 - 500 BV 'mech but none of the variants are under the limit (although one is very close). One variant has no BV or BV2. And the main variation comes in under the limit in straight BV but not BV2. So the question arises do we use BV to qualify the 'mech categories or do we use the supported BV2?--[[Special:Contributions/86.7.73.27|86.7.73.27]] 22:04, 10 May 2010 (UTC) | This mech is listed as a 0 - 500 BV 'mech but none of the variants are under the limit (although one is very close). One variant has no BV or BV2. And the main variation comes in under the limit in straight BV but not BV2. So the question arises do we use BV to qualify the 'mech categories or do we use the supported BV2?--[[Special:Contributions/86.7.73.27|86.7.73.27]] 22:04, 10 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
:The -2D has a BV of 432. --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 23:29, 10 May 2010 (UTC) | :The -2D has a BV of 432. --[[User:Scaletail|Scaletail]] 23:29, 10 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Starterbook Sword and Dragon== | ||
| + | Removed the Update needed tag for Starterbook Sword and Dragon. The ''Commando'' presented there is a standard COM-2D.--[[User:Mbear|Mbear]] 15:57, 13 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 11:57, 13 September 2010
|
This article is within the scope of the Project BattleMechs, a collaborative effort to improve BattleTechWiki's coverage of BattleMechs. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
|
Production Date
I noticed the production date change, TRO 25 lists it as 2466, 25revised aparently lists 2486. Im wonderign if 25R does superceed 25 in this or if it was clarified in the new Stiener book.CJKeys 22:14, 6 May 2007 (CDT)
- Since 25R came out after 25, my assumption is that the later book trumps. I just figured it was a typo, but now that I know there is a discrepancy I'll try to do some more research and see what I can come up with. --Scaletail 11:10, 8 May 2007 (CDT)
Variants
COM-7B: I thought jump distance increased in increments of thirty meters. One hundred and sixty meters doesn't fit that. Judging by the Commando's speed I thought either 150 meters or 180 meters would be more likely. But I thought I'd check first. Haruspex 05:02, 25 March 2008 (CDT)
- Thanks for catching that. It's fixed. --Scaletail 18:45, 25 March 2008 (CDT)
Is the COM-1D Commando misssing? It's mentioned in the TRO3039.--BigDuke66 12:07, 15 June 2009 (PDT)
BV Category
This mech is listed as a 0 - 500 BV 'mech but none of the variants are under the limit (although one is very close). One variant has no BV or BV2. And the main variation comes in under the limit in straight BV but not BV2. So the question arises do we use BV to qualify the 'mech categories or do we use the supported BV2?--86.7.73.27 22:04, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
- The -2D has a BV of 432. --Scaletail 23:29, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
Starterbook Sword and Dragon
Removed the Update needed tag for Starterbook Sword and Dragon. The Commando presented there is a standard COM-2D.--Mbear 15:57, 13 September 2010 (UTC)