Revision as of 21:39, 16 June 2009 by Revanche (talk | contribs) (It is CRS: right)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
This article is within the scope of the BattleMechs WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve BattleTechWiki's coverage of BattleMechs. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.

This article has been flagged for review by the Project: BattleMechs team. If you have reviewed this article, please remove the tr parameter from this template.

It is CRS[edit]

Just for the ones that like me stuble over the different designations the new Mech is CNS-5M and the old CRS-3M. not very often you see a change in the prefix but this is confirmed via CBT forum by Herbert A. Beas II.--BigDuke66 13:10, 16 June 2009 (PDT)

Not that I doubt you, but could you provide the link (here)? I'd be glad to add it in as a reference note on the article itself, if you don't know how. I'd just hate to have someone change it back, and we'd have to wait to re-discover your realization (or maybe even lose it).--Revanche (talk|contribs) 14:58, 16 June 2009 (PDT)
No problem just look here: [1]. Problem is that this thread will sooner or later(I think after 6 months but I'm not sure) land in the archive of the forum so the link has to be adjusted.--BigDuke66 16:12, 16 June 2009 (PDT)
You're right. And even though they 'move' it to an archive, eventually it'll be pushed out, like the past archives have been. Maybe the ref note should indicate what Herb said and when. While after the link is no longer valid/cannot be found and cannot be verified, the fact that it fully references who, what, where, etc., should be enough. --Revanche (talk|contribs) 18:39, 16 June 2009 (PDT)