Difference between revisions of "Talk:Destroyed Manufacturing Centers"

m (Response and suggestion.)
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
:::Hy, i cleanup at the moment the manufacturing center category, and my 2nd cleanup are the Destroyed factorys, i removed step by step the named destroyed factorys (create new articles if enought fluff is on stard, and moved content to existing articles).--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] 22:48, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
 
:::Hy, i cleanup at the moment the manufacturing center category, and my 2nd cleanup are the Destroyed factorys, i removed step by step the named destroyed factorys (create new articles if enought fluff is on stard, and moved content to existing articles).--[[User:Doneve|Doneve]] 22:48, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
 +
:::::Hello Doneve, renaming it destroyed factories is same thing as Destroyed Manufacturing Centers.  I would suggested like List of Manufacturing Centers and in the article having a note when these factories were actually active.  That would be more useful and be able show when factorys were active. example:
 +
*Johnson Industries -
 +
**New Syrtis Factory (Active 2500 to 3067), Damaged (3068-3079) - Rebuilt 3085. 
 +
 +
Something like that. -- [[User:Wrangler|Wrangler]] 23:29, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:29, 7 March 2011

List should be re-organized and renamed

I think this list needs be better defined. Breaking it down between destroyed factories, disabled, and so forth. Many of these factory still exist, should be better defined. Some of these company resumed production of their products. Name of the article is bit..accurate? -- Wrangler 18:57, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Perhaps better to use categories to flag destroyed and active, of course then we'd still need to over come ones like Mitchell Vehicles which have both active and destroyed facilities Cyc 19:14, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
Well, I believe this can be misleading in way this list is. SOme facilities do not stay destroyed. I maybe better to have a time period of its destruction and additional if restored resurrection. I prefer have them in the individual article than list of destroyed one. Were going bloat the database with all these categories sooner or later. I like see master list of manfactures and just have status next to them instead. -- Wrangler 14:32, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
Hy, i cleanup at the moment the manufacturing center category, and my 2nd cleanup are the Destroyed factorys, i removed step by step the named destroyed factorys (create new articles if enought fluff is on stard, and moved content to existing articles).--Doneve 22:48, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
Hello Doneve, renaming it destroyed factories is same thing as Destroyed Manufacturing Centers. I would suggested like List of Manufacturing Centers and in the article having a note when these factories were actually active. That would be more useful and be able show when factorys were active. example:
  • Johnson Industries -
    • New Syrtis Factory (Active 2500 to 3067), Damaged (3068-3079) - Rebuilt 3085.

Something like that. -- Wrangler 23:29, 7 March 2011 (UTC)